Anne
On 3/17/06, Ali Sadik Kumlali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thank you Anne. But, AFAIK, WSDL does not support IN-Multiple OUT as operation type. If WSDL does not has signature for multiple results, how can client assume that it must wait for more than one results?
Thanks a lot,
Ali Sadik KumlaliAnne Thomas Manes < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Ali,Do you mean;
1) Client sends request without waiting a response to it. Request has a CSV tag which has many lines to process.
2) Server processes the message and sends a result for each line in CS V. It sends results to the client without waiting a response.
Yes. (Or alternatively, each message exchange could return an "ack", which would be easier to implement if you're using Axis 1.)
AnneOn 3/16/06, Al i Sadik Kumlali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi Eran, Hi Anne!
What a quick response! What a good community! Thank you very very much. I love this community and hope companies discover the power of open-source products. I post your responses to my colleagues in the company to let them recognize that support does not always mean money, and vice versa :)
Eran,
Our current implementation uses DocSoap XDK based custom codes. Since we are required to handle all the soap related stuff manually, we are able to support "IN-multiple OUT" type messaging. Actually, manual operations are one of the reasons we want to give DocSoap XDK up. Therefore, it would be great if I could find a robust way in Axis2 to support "IN-multiple OUT" type messaging.
Anne,
Do you mean;
1) Client sends request without waiting a response to it. Request has a CSV tag which has many lines to process.
2) Server processes the message and sends a result for each line in CS V. It sends results to the client without waiting a response.
Many thanks to you both!
Ali Sadik Kumlali
Anne Thomas Manes < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:You can also implement the pattern using one-way messages.
AnneOn 3/16/06, Eran Chinthaka < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:Hi Ali,
Interesting scenario.
First of all, Axis2 supports IN only and IN-OUT invocations by
*default.* But thats doesn't mean we can not do IN-multiple OUT meps.
Yes, we haven't come across them so far, but our pipe model enablescustom MEPs. If you really ne ed this we can give a try to implement the
first custom MEP using Axi s2. (or you can convince your boss otherwise ;-) )
-- Chinthaka
Ali Sadik Kumlali wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> There is an interesting messaging pattern between my company
> and its partner. Partner sends a message containing a tag named
> CSV that has multiple lines in it. Although we process all of them
> separately, we assume it as one message. After processing has
> been completed, we send a result message for every line in CSV.
> Thus, request-responseS type messaging occurs.
>
> This seems very strange when I look at the async messaging
> samples that come with Axis2. If I understand correctly, when
> client sends a request in an async-non blocker way, it also
> starts an http server to listen response. When the server finishes
> processing, it sends the result back to the client's http server.
> Consequently, each request has one response.
>> AFAIK, we a re allowed to have one-way and request-response
> type operations, but not request-responseS.
>
> Is there a way to handle request-responseS type messaging
> with Axis2? Or do I ne ed to convince my boss to give these kind
> of messaging up? :)
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> Ali Sadik Kumlali
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Yahoo! Mail
> Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail
> < http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39174/*http://photomail.mail.yahoo.com >
> makes sharing a breeze.
Yahoo! Mail
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.
