Hi Chamil,

Thanks for the quick reply.

I am still having difficulties. Is there a fully functional example of
SOAP via SMTP (ie a zip, jar, other that contains both client and
source code that can be downloaded and run)?

Also when building from WSDL into stubs / skeletons where do the
changes have to be made to use SMTP as a transport?

Cheers
Jack...


On 26/04/06, Chamil Thanthrimudalige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> Thanks for finding the typo.
>
> UtilsMailServer is in the integration module which is not shipped
> with any distribution. I think we need to move this to some other
> module that will be shipped. If you can get the source from a svn
> checkout[1] you will get UtilsMailServer[2].
>
> Also pleas make sure you are using Sun javamail and activation jars.
>
> Best Regards,
> Chamil Thanthrimudalige
>
>
> [1] http://ws.apache.org/axis2/svn.html
> [2] It is at [Axis2 source dir]/modules/integration/test/org/apache/
> axis2/mail/UtilsMailServer.java
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm having real trouble setting up a working example of SOAP over SMTP
> - I've looked at the user guide but the example seems broken (see
> below).
>
> Does anyone have a working example of this or any pointers? Would be
> muchly appreciated.
>
>
> Some specific issues for example:
>
> For example in Section 2. in the code you have:
>         ConfigurationContext configContextbuilder
>                 .buildConfigurationContext(file.getAbsolutePath());
>
> This is not even valid java and should probably read something like:
>         ConfigurationContext configContext  =
>                 builder.buildConfigurationContext(file.getAbsolutePath
> ());
>
> Also the UtilsMailServer that is mentioned cannot be found anywhere
> (in the src or bin or doc distributions)?
>
> Is it possible that this section of the user guide is revised and if
> so please make the source code for this section available somewhere as
> a zip / jar / other (or better still include it in the samples with
> the bin or src distributions).
>
> Cheers
> Jack...
>
> The claim "natural" is not synonymous with safe.

Reply via email to