Re: SOAP namespacing conventions

Thu, 04 May 2006 16:41:29 -0700

There is no standard convention.

The SOAP 1.1 spec [1] examples use "SOAP-ENV".
The WSDL 1.1 spec [2] examples use "soapenv".
The WS-I Basic Profile [3] uses "soap".
The WS-Security 2004 standard  [4] uses ""S11".

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl
[3] http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.1-2004-08-24.html
[4] http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-soap-message-security-1.0.pdf

On 5/4/06, Simon Fell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
tell them to go read the xml namespaces spec.

From: Steve Pruitt [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 12:12 PM

To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: SOAP namespacing conventions

yes i know.  however I have a customer that insists it should be "soap", so I am gathering up some rebuttals.  i thought if maybe most folks used something, then maybe....
 
 
-SP

From: Simon Fell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 12:58 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: SOAP namespacing conventions

they are all sematically equivilent, the actual prefix used carries no weight.
 
Cheers
Simon

From: Steve Pruitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 6:27 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: SOAP namespacing conventions

Is there is a "standard" or "widely accepted" convention for naming the soap namespace.
I have seen:
 
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap=" http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/ ">
<SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/ ">
 
 
Thanks,
 
-Steve Pruitt

Reply via email to