Hi Ruchith,

thanks for your advice.
I read about rampart (WSS4j) but didn't get in too deep.
Using plain text password isn't suitable for my goals. As I said, this password 
could be directly accessed by other parties, who should definitely not use my 
service.
I thought about using a combination of a password an the hashed URL of the 
Client as a password-mechanism. But this solution doesn't satisfy me either.
Do you have any details for the password digest and the callback solution; it 
didn't get really clear to me.

Any further ideas and / or links are highly appreciated

Thanks a lot

Bille

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [email protected]
> Gesendet: 02.06.06 09:55:47
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: [axis2] design issues on client authentication


> Hi Bille,
> 
> How about using "rampart" module to enable UsernameToken
> authentication on that particular service. This will force all your
> clients to send requests with a UsernameToken.
> 
> With this approach you can limit your configurations to the service
> only. If you use a plain text password with the service then you can
> carryout the authentication at the service impl itself. Or else if you
> use the "PasswordDigest" mechanism you can handle handle multiple user
> auth in the PasswordCallbackHandler that you specify in the
> configuration.
> 
> If you are interested in this option and if this you want more
> clarifications , I can provide you a further explanations.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ruchith
> 
> On 6/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello to the list,
> >
> > I'm  interested how you would deal such a scenario:
> > I have a web service which is meant to run in an Intranet-Environment in 
> > our company. There will be different Intranet-Websites and other 
> > applications which will use the service.
> > My aim is to limit the use of the service to special clients; say 
> > application A and D and WebSite X. How can I achieve this without using 
> > some hard coded keys which I register at the service.
> > I'm against those keys because some code is accessable through a Content 
> > Management System, so it would be easy to "copy" the keys und use it in 
> > some "not registered" application.
> >
> > I hope I put it somehow clearly into words. Thanks in adavance for any 
> > hints and comments
> >
> > Bille
> > _____________________________________________________________________
> > Der WEB.DE SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
> > http://smartsurfer.web.de/?mc=100071&distributionid=000000000071
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


______________________________________________________________
Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS!
Jetzt bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://f.web.de/?mc=021193


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to