>Try <xsd:choice> instead. >Or maybe a substitution group. Support for substitution groups is pretty much of a non-starter in .NET.
So if this the service contract (WSDL/Schema etc. etc..) will be shared with anyone using .NET so that they can generated their client proxies from that info, I would recommend <xsd:choice> instead of substitution groups. Regards, - Anil -----Original Message----- From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 12:08 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: General approach for xsd:union? >> On the other hand, is there a better way entirely? XMLBeans perhaps? Yes. Don't use <xsd:union>. Try <xsd:choice> instead. Or maybe a substitution group. Anne On 7/7/06, Nathan Sowatskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > I guess we all know that xsd:union types are not supported for Axis > 1.x, so we need to write our own de/serialisers. > > Does anyone have any useful guidance on how to do that please? > > On the other hand, is there a better way entirely? XMLBeans perhaps? > > Many thanks > > Nathan > > Nathan Sowatskey - Technical Leader, NMTG CTO Engineering - > +34-638-083-675, +34-91-201-2139 - AIM NathanCisco - > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
