Brennan A few comments.
* WS-RM is about interoperability, which has no guarantee in JMS (no standard wire format)
+1
* A JMS server is likely to be faster (no XML parsing)
We want to work on this :-) I agree at this point Sandesha isn't performance tuned
* Most JMS implementations, like ActiveMQ, are likely to be more mature
Again we are working on this!
* WS-RM is mostly focused on message acknowledgement, ordering, and dealing with duplicates, but doesn't provide other QoS guarantees (e.g. durability)
RM can certainly offer durability. Its just that its not part of the wire protocol. For example, Sandesha allows you to use a persistent storage manager.
* WS-RM is good for bridging different types of messaging systems (i.e., the two technologies are not necessarily exclusive...)
Yes I agree. Paul -- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
