Hi,
It seems to me that you have to go one level deep. See whether there
is a getAddress method in the Address class.
XMLBeans generates a lot of classes and things are a bit confusing
specially when types and elements have similar names. AFAIK XMLBeans
generates a class per type and element. So there would be a class
generated for the address type and also for the address element. My
guess is you have to check the address type object instead of the
address element object.

Ajith

On 1/3/07, Bo Xie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Ajith. Could you be more specific on how to figure out the right type
of the instance? Here is the code snippet and the output on the service
side.
The getAddressArray indeed returns Address[] which is good. But the
instanceof always returns Address even for USAddress instance. The
interesting thing is the toString output of the addr variable. It includes
the correct xsi-type for each instance. So how can I do the correct
instanceof to figure the right type to cast in this case?

Thanks,
-Bo

----Code snippet----
public  void
updateAddresses(samples.quickstart.service.xmlbeans.xsd.UpdateAddressesDocument
param3)
    {
        //Todo fill this with the necessary business logic
        String symbol = param3.getUpdateAddresses().getSymbol();
        System.err.println(getCurrentTime()+"- Update Symbol:" + symbol);

        Address[] addrs = param3.getUpdateAddresses ().getAddressesArray();
        for (int i = 0; i < addrs.length; i++) {
            Address addr = addrs[i];
            if(addr instanceof USAddress) System.err.println("USAddress
instance");
            if(addr instanceof Address) System.err.println("Address
instance");
            System.err.println(addr.getClass().getName()+":"+addr);
        }
   ...}

 ----Output from the code ----
Address instance
samples.quickstart.service.xmlbeans.xsd.impl.AddressImpl:
<xml-fragment xsi:type="xsd:US-Address"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xmlns:xsd=" http://quickstart.samples/xsd";
xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>
  <name xmlns=" http://quickstart.samples/xsd";>company name</name>
  <city xmlns="http://quickstart.samples/xsd";>Sunnyvale</city>
  <state xmlns=" http://quickstart.samples/xsd";>CA</state>
  <zip xmlns="http://quickstart.samples/xsd";>94087</zip>
</xml-fragment>

Address instance
samples.quickstart.service.xmlbeans.xsd.impl.AddressImpl:<xml-fragment
xsi:type="xsd:Address" xmlns:xsi="
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xmlns:ns1="http://quickstart.samples/xsd";
xmlns:xsd="http://quickstart.samples/xsd "
xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>
  <name xmlns="http://quickstart.samples/xsd ">company</name>
  <city xmlns="http://quickstart.samples/xsd";>Hong Kong</city>
</xml-fragment>


 On 1/3/07, Ajith Ranabahu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Since the xsi:type attribute is present and points to the USAddress,
> the generated object should be of  type USAddress. Perhaps the problem
> is the way you check the instanceof. I mean XMLBeans should have
> generated a getAddresses method to updateAddress ? (It's a little bit
> weird how XMLBeans treats these schemas but I'm guessing)
> If you can use a debugger and go through the object hierarchy at
> runtime you should be able to figure this out
>
> Ajith
>
> On 1/3/07, Bo Xie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks Ajith for the quick response.
> >
> > I have tried to use the instanceof to test if the instance is USAddress,
> > but the test returns false. Without that, the type cast is not safe as
> > the Address list can have items of either Address or USAddress. My
> > question here is should the java instance created from XML be of type
> > USAddress even though the signature is Address. Is there anyway to make
> > this happen?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Bo
> > Ajith Ranabahu wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > The reason here is that you have set the type of the addresses element
> > > to be 'Address' rather than USAddress (the code generator would put
> > > the reference for the Address rather than the USAddress). However
> > > since the xsi:type attribute is present the deserializer should create
> > > the right object and you can just use a type cast to get to the right
> > > object.
> > >
> > > HTH
> > >
> > > Ajith
> > >
> > > On 1/2/07, Bo Xie < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Hi there,
> > >>
> > >>   I am new to axis2 with XMLBean data binding, please help me with
the
> > >> following issue.
> > >>
> > >>   I modified the quickstart sample XMLBean program to try a WSDL with
> > >> the
> > >> following types. The type US-Address is a derived from type Address.
> > >> I would
> > >> like to create a service operation updateAddresses to change
> > >> addresses of a
> > >> company based on a symbol. The addresses is an array that can take
> > >> either
> > >> Address or USAddress instances.
> > >>
> > >>           <xs:complexType name="Address">
> > >>                 <xs:sequence>
> > >>                     <xs:element name="name" type="xs:string"
> > >> minOccurs="0"/>
> > >>                      <xs:element name="street"
type="xs:string"/>
> > >>                     <xs:element name="city" type="xs:string"/>
> > >>                 </xs:sequence>
> > >>             </xs:complexType>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>             <xs:complexType name="US-Address">
> > >>                 <xs:complexContent>
> > >>                     <xs:extension base="ipo:Address">
> > >>                         <xs:sequence>
> > >>                             <xs:element name="state"
> > >> type="ipo:US-State"/>
> > >>                             <xs:element name="zip"
> > >> type="xs:positiveInteger"/>
> > >>                         </xs:sequence>
> > >>                     </xs:extension>
> > >>                 </xs:complexContent>
> > >>             </xs:complexType>
> > >>
> > >>          <xs:element name="updateAddresses">
> > >>                 <xs:complexType>
> > >>                     <xs:sequence>
> > >>                         <xs:element name="symbol" type="xs:string"
> > >> nillable="true"/>
> > >>                         <xs:element name="addresses"
type="ipo:Address"
> > >> maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
> > >>                     </xs:sequence>
> > >>                 </xs:complexType>
> > >>
> > >>       I used WSDL2JAVA with XMLBean data binding to generate the
> > >> skeleton
> > >> and stub code. All looks great and the SOAP exchange looks fine too.
> > >>
> > >>       In the client code, I created one instance if USAddress and one
> > >> instance of Address and put them into the addresses list. In the SOAP
> > >> request message, the instances are as  shown as follows below. Note,
> > >> xsi-type for the instance indicate the correct types which is nice.
> > >>  <soapenv:Body>
> > >>  <updateAddresses xmlns=" http://quickstart.samples/xsd";>
> > >>
> > >>  <symbol>XYZ</symbol>
> > >>  <addresses
> > >>
xmlns:xsi="http;//www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> > >> xmlns:xsd="
> > >> http://quickstart.samples/xsd"; xsi:type="xsd:US-Address">
> > >>  <name>company name</name>
> > >>  <city>Sunnyvale</city>
> > >>  <state>CA</state>
> > >>
> > >>  <zip>94087</zip>
> > >>  </addresses>
> > >>  <addresses
> > >>
xmlns:xsi="http;//www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> > >> xmlns:xsd="http://quickstart.samples/xsd
> > >> " xsi:type="xsd:Address">
> > >>  <name>company name</name>
> > >>  <city>Hong Kong</city>
> > >>  </addresses>
> > >>  </updateAddresses>
> > >>  </soapenv:Body>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>    The problem is when the XML object mapped into java object on the
> > >> service
> > >> side, all the XML address object passed to the skeleton are all of
> > >> Address
> > >> type. I would expect one instance be Address type, another be
USAddress
> > >> type. Since xsi-type in the SOAP message has the right type, why the
> > >> XMLBean
> > >> object is not created as the derived type? Is there any option in
> > >> WSDL2JAVA
> > >> to make this work?
> > >>
> > >>    From the XMLBean Address java object, how can I access the
xsi-type
> > >> attribute that was available in the XML string?
> > >>
> > >>    If I am not heading the right direction, can anyone suggest some
> > >> alternatives?
> > >>
> > >>  Thanks for your time!
> > >>
> > >> -Bo
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Ajith Ranabahu
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>




--
Ajith Ranabahu

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to