Dennis, To be clear, does this "marker" class need to physically exist?
Josh On 3/26/07, Dennis Sosnoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Josh, If you're using unwrapped you shouldn't need to map this at all. If you're using wrapped handling you'd just have a "marker" class with an empty mapping: <mapping class="updateResponse" name="updateResponse"/> You can see an example of the unwrapped handling for this at http://www.sosnoski.com/jibx-wiki/space/axis2-jibx/example (with the WSDL and code at http://www.sosnoski.com/jibx-wiki/space/axis2-jibx/example/library-service ). - Dennis Dennis M. Sosnoski SOA and Web Services in Java Training and Consulting http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz Seattle, WA +1-425-939-0576 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117 Josh wrote: > All, > > I am having difficulting dealing with an existing WSDL which declares > a "void" response message. I have the following in my wsdl: > > <element name="updateResponse"> > <complexType/> > </element> > > <wsdl:message name="updateResponse"> > <wsdl:part element="impl:updateResponse" name="parameters"/> > </wsdl:message> > > Because this is really a void return, how would I map this using JiBX? > > Regards, > > Joshua --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
