We have support for the WSDL binding spec and I intend to implement the WSA-Metadata spec once it's finalised. There's no problem with having an implementation of both, it's just less than ideal for a JSR.
David On 29/03/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Angel We are just fine AFAIK Paul On 3/29/07, Angel Todorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I just came across this on the JAX-WS homepage: > > ===================== > You might have noticed that JAX-WS 2.1 RI download link takes you to > an Error page. We have fixed that to say what is really going on with > JAXWS 2.1 specification and RI. > > So why we have to do this? Well, WS-Addressing WSDL Binding spec was > normatively referenced by JAX-WS 2.1 specification and was in CR state > when the spec and RI went final few weeks back. After we released > JAXWS 2.1 RI and the spec, it came to our attention that WS-Addressing > Working Group has decided to drop this spec and instead do > WS-Addressing Metadata (a Working Draft now). So in effect the Binding > spec is dead and JAXWS 2.1 specification references it! > ===================== > > Is Axis2 also prone to this problem ? Thanks in advance. > > Regards, > Angel > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- David Illsley - IBM Web Services Development --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
