Although the schema says it's legal, that doesn't mean that products necessarily support it. I would avoid defining multiple services in a single WSDL file. Note that a single service can expose any number of ports, and each port can implement a different binding, exposing different portType operations.
WSDL 2.0 imposed (IMO) an unreasonable restriction of one interface (the replacement for portType) per service. Anne On 5/16/07, Glen Mazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ouch. I misread the schema. Thanks/Sorry. Glen Am Donnerstag, den 17.05.2007, 08:10 +1200 schrieb Dennis Sosnoski: > Actually it's unbounded: > > <complexType name="definitionsType"> > <complexContent> > <extension base="wsdl:documented"> > <sequence> > <element ref="wsdl:import" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > <element ref="wsdl:types" minOccurs="0"/> > <element ref="wsdl:message" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > <element ref="wsdl:portType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > <element ref="wsdl:binding" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > <element ref="wsdl:service" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > <any namespace="##other" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"> > <annotation> > <documentation>to support extensibility elements </documentation> > </annotation> > </any> > </sequence> > <attribute name="targetNamespace" type="uriReference" use="optional"/> > <attribute name="name" type="NMTOKEN" use="optional"/> > </extension> > </complexContent> > </complexType> > > So the answer is yes, the WSDL can contain multiple instances of > anything except the <wsdl:types> element. Note that the repeated > elements need to be in the correct order, though - the types element, > then all the messages, then all the portTypes, etc. I've seen some > schema that had repeated elements all jumbled together, and these are > invalid. > > - Dennis > > Dennis M. Sosnoski > SOA and Web Services in Java > Axis2 Training and Consulting > http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz > Seattle, WA +1-425-939-0576 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117 > > > > Glen Mazza wrote: > > No, according to the schema[1], the maxOccurs of wsdl:service is 1. > > > > Glen > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl#A4.1 > > > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 16.05.2007, 08:33 -0700 schrieb Anil VVNN: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Can one WSDL file contain multiple operations i.e. multiple <wsdl:service> > >> tags with each having its own port and binding information. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
