Hi Eran, Actually, I meant exactly the opposite that INCLUDE_OPTIONAL_HEADERS has nothing to do with fixing this particular problem. It may be that INCLUDE_OPTIONAL_HEADERS may be a bit of a misnomer which may have led to some of the confusion. I have now checked in the fix for this so let me know if there are any other issues.
Cheers Brian DePradine Web Services Development IBM Hursley External +44 (0) 1962 816319 Internal 246319 If you can't find the time to do it right the first time, where will you find the time to do it again? Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 28/06/2007 22:51:54: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Brian, > > Did you mean to say we should enable this for both addressing versions? > Just wanted to clarify. If yes +1 from me. > > Thanks, > Chinthaka > > Brian De Pradine wrote: > > > > Hello Andreas and Chinthaka, > > > > You are correct that the INCLUDE_OPTIONAL_HEADERS property is only used > > for 2005/08 addressing. It is used to turn on/off the spec defined > > defaulting behaviour with regard to the addressing headers sent in a > > message. As the 2004/08 spec does not define similar defaulting > > behaviour this property is not used when that spec is engaged. > > > > All that being said, the current behaviour is not correct, so please > > raise a JIRA to cover this issue [1]. > > > > [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2 > > > > Cheers > > > > Brian DePradine > > Web Services Development > > IBM Hursley > > External +44 (0) 1962 816319 Internal 246319 > > > > If you can't find the time to do it right the first time, where will you > > find the time to do it again? > > > > > > Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 28/06/2007 04:01:13: > > > > Hi Andreas, > > > > I looked at the code and in AddressingOutHandler.java:425 it checks > > includeOptionalHeaders property together with the addressing version. > > Basically what it means is that includeOptionalProperty param will only > > work for WS-A final version. > > When I looked at svn history that line was committed by David Illsley, > > so I assume he must have a good reason to do it only for the final > >> version. > > Let's wait and see why he did that. > > > > I cc'ed this to David also so I hope he will chime in. > > > > Chinthaka > > > > Andreas Bobek wrote: > >> Hello, > > > >> how can I omit the ReplyTo header in outgoing one way messages? I use > >> submission version of WS-Addressing and a fire-and-forget client. I > >> inspected the addressing code a little bit and found a > >> INCLUDE_OPTIONAL_HEADERS option, but setting it to false was not > >> successful. > > > >> Here is the call: > > > >> public static final void main(String[] s) { > >> try { > >> String repository = s[0]; > >> ConfigurationContext confCtxt = ConfigurationContextFactory > >> .createConfigurationContextFromFileSystem(repository, > >> (new File(repository + "/conf/axis2.xml")) > >> .getAbsolutePath()); > >> ListenerManager listenerManager = new ListenerManager(); > >> listenerManager.init(confCtxt); > >> listenerManager.start(); > >> Options options = new Options(); > > > >> options.setSoapVersionURI(SOAP12Constants.SOAP_ENVELOPE_NAMESPACE_URI); > >> options.setProperty(AddressingConstants.WS_ADDRESSING_VERSION, > >> AddressingConstants.Submission.WSA_NAMESPACE); > >> options.setAction("anyAction"); > > > >> options.setProperty(AddressingConstants.INCLUDE_OPTIONAL_HEADERS,false); > >> // transport settings... > >> ServiceClient client = new ServiceClient(confCtxt, null); > >> client.setOptions(options); > >> OMFactory factory = OMAbstractFactory.getOMFactory(); > >> OMElement el = factory.createOMElement("Test", null); > >> client.fireAndForget(el); > >> } > >> catch (Exception e) { > >> e.printStackTrace(); > >> } > > > > > >> This is what is sent: > > > >> <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> > >> <soapenv:Envelope > >> xmlns:wsa="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing"; > >> xmlns:soapenv="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope";> > >> <soapenv:Header> > >> <wsa:ReplyTo> > >> <wsa:Address> > > > >> http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/addressing/role/anonymous > >> </wsa:Address> > >> </wsa:ReplyTo> > >> <wsa:MessageID> > >> urn:uuid:01673833EEDE7612381182964039233 > >> </wsa:MessageID> > >> <wsa:Action> > >> anyAction > >> </wsa:Action> > >> </soapenv:Header> > >> <soapenv:Body> > >> <Test> > >> </Test> > >> </soapenv:Body> > >> </soapenv:Envelope> > > > > > >> ReplyTo is optional in Submission version. So why it is set? And how > >> can I > >> omit it? > >> I think this was not the case in earlier versions. > > > > > >> Thanks, > >> Andreas Bobek. > > > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > >> > - --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > / > > / > > > /Unless stated otherwise above: > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > > 741598. > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU/ > > > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFGhC16jON2uBzUhh8RAn5OAJ9aurouRdUlPxYx2i8otwoVT7GKqgCfRQOO > Tc1DtsxP5k30pQ+30AsVBYY= > =gpAc > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
