Hi robert, good point , I will update the site with the RC this time.
Thanks Deepal > Lack of getting the RC's being used by end users has I think been one > of the main causes for instability. I'd really like to try something > new this time around that might get more users using them. > > I'm all for "Release early and often" - in fact arguably we don't do > enough point releases. I realize though that there are lots of deps > and its hard to coordinate all the releases. > > Anyways, IIRC the RC's never got put on the download page. The only > announcement is to the list. Other projects have better usage of their > RC's and I think it'd be worth exploring what could be done > differently to get more RC usage of axis2. > > I've noticed xmlbeans, for example, has been broken on every release > so far. And while I tested svn in the middle of dev, I never did test > the RC's so I accept part of the blame. This time around I plan on > testing xmlbeans on some of my complex schemas, and the other things I > personally use like spring and the soapmonitor. > > Michele, from what I've seen you're had some of the most advanced use > cases of axis2. If you could do some RC testing with some of your use > cases I'd think that'd go a long way to making 1.3 the most stable yet. > > No one uses 100% of axis2, but I'd think that if we got more people > using the RC's on _their_ code, it'd help plenty. > > Robert > > On 7/2/07, * Davanum Srinivas* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > no it doesnt. this is a classic chicken and egg issue. thats why we > make so many RC's but still end users dont play enough with RC's as > much as we'd like them to :) > > thx, > dims > > On 7/2/07, Michele Mazzucco < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Eran, > > > > On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 18:26 -0400, Eran Chinthaka wrote: > > > I do agree with you that we need a reliable Axis2, but that > doesn't > > > mean > > > we need to keep on postponing releases "until" we fix everything. > > > > > > there was no insult in my comments. My point, instead, is that > if you > > want new features you can download the last nightly build. If > you want > > something which works *properly* you download a release. Does it > make > > sense to release a new version and then ask to people to > download the > > next nightly build because the release is "broken"? > > > > > > Michele > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com > <http://davanum.wordpress.com> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- Thanks, Deepal ................................................................ "The highest tower is built one brick at a time" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
