Thilina Gunarathne wrote:
> Looks like a bug... Please report a JIRA...
>
> You may also try replacing byte[] with javax.activation.DataHandler...
> DataHandler is the recommended way when using large attachments...
>
> thanks,
> Thilina
>
> On 7/24/07, Georgi Yonchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thilina Gunarathne wrote:
>> >> and Deepal, yes works fine, but try it with larger byte[] size,
>> >> with larger, in the payload goes array from bytes ?!
>> >> not encoded in base64 ..
>> > Not clear what you meant?... Do they go as native binary in the form
>> > of an attachment or inside the soap body...
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Thilina
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> inside in the soap body, the bytes are not encoded in base64, is
>> represented like integers
>> this is a part of the xml :
>>
>> <ns:byteData>9</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>102</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>111</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>110</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>116</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>45</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>115</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>105</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>122</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>101</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>58</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>32</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>49</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>48</ns:byteData
>>
>> ><ns:byteData>112</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>116</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>59</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>13</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>10</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>9</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>102</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>111</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>110</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>116</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>45</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>119</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>101</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>105</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>103</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>104</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>116</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>58</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>32</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>110</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>111</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>114</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>109</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>97</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>108</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>59</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>13</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>10</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>125</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>13</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>10</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>46</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>99</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>111</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>110</n
>>
>> s:byteData><ns:byteData
>>
>> 2000
>>
>> >116</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>101</ns:byteData><ns:byteData>110</ns:byteData>
>>
>>
>> this happens only when i set the byte[] in Complex return object
>>
>> class Result{
>> private byte[] bytes;
>> set..
>> get..
>> }
>>
>> and the call likes:
>> public Res test(){
>> ..set byte[] in res
>> return res;
>> }
>>
>> if the call is :
>> public byte[] test(){
>> ..
>> }
>> everything goes well...
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>
Hi Thilina,
i report it on JIRA, and is fixed on both tags/branches in the svn...
can you give some hints about this DataHandler ...
some example how to implement it,
10x a lot in advance :)
George
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
