Hi Dennis , I quickly went through your article and in the conclusion you have the following which I do not agree
*JiBX* is the only alternative that supports working with existing Java classes, though Axis2 does include a limited form of plain old Java object (POJO) support that can be used for simple cases. It also provides the best support for unwrapped service methods in Axis2. But the JiBX support integrated into Axis2 doesn't handle code generation from schema, and even the separate code generation from schema support provided by the JiBX tools provides only limited schema support. >>>> In Axis2 we support any kind of Java bean , there is no limitation for simple classes . Only thing we do not support in our POJO is enumerations, and we have a bit test cases to validate whether we are doing it right or wrong. Yes at the initial stage we had only support for simple class but not anymore . Thanks Deepal > My devWorks article comparing ADB, XMLBeans, and JiBX data binding > with Axis2 has now been published: > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-java3 I *am* > the primary developer for JiBX, but tried to give a fair > representation of all three frameworks in the article. It also > includes full sample code, for both the current 1.2 release and the > in-progress 1.3 release. > > While I'm promoting my own stuff, I'll also mention that I'm planning > a trip to Australia in early September for on-site consulting and > training visits (see the Axis2 training course outline: > http://www.sosnoski.com/companys/axis2class.html), and will follow-up > with another trip to the U.S. later in the (northern hemisphere) fall. > Visits to other parts of the world can also be arranged... email me > directly if interested. > > - Dennis > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
