On 9/5/07, Gudla, Natraj (GE Money, consultant) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The code generated from AXIS2 1.3 looks to be good. But Amila, we have > almost started the development work and it not a feasible thing to swtich > version at this moment. Is there a work around? >
The only work around is getting the source code and changing the ADBBeanTemple. Anyway going to axis2 1.3 should not change your development work. as I guess you should have developed only the Skelton and client classes which uses ADB generated classes. The interface of these classes has not changed. So the generated code with Axis2 1.3 should comple and work with the what ever code you have developed. Amila. and with parsing the double value, i see that my IDE XML editor shows up the > value in red saying it is not a valid double. where as 0.00 i feel is the > correct one. > > Thanks > Natraj > > > -----Original Message----- > *From:* Amila Suriarachchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* 05 September 2007 11:48 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: On ADB Binding > > > > On 9/5/07, Gudla, Natraj (GE Money, consultant) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > The IDE ( eclipse ) does not recognize 0.00 as a valid value for the > > schema element earlier decalared as double with minInclusive value of > > 0.00. I have seen few articles on the net which talk about the > > conversion problems with 0, 0.00, 0.0000 etc all are not considered to > > be zeros. > > > > you mean Double.parseDouble("0.00"); > does not work in your IDE? > > Another problem as i had earlier stated is AXIS does not genereted the > > conditions properly to check for the minInclusive value stated in the > > schema. It puts a condition to check for something greater. > > > > Please check with axis2 1.3. this should be fixed. > > here is the generated code for me > if (org.apache.axis2.databinding.utils.ConverterUtil.compare (param, "0.00") > >= 0){ > > this.localGEM_PostvDbl_Type=param; > } > else { > throw new > java.lang.RuntimeException(); > } > > -----Original Message----- > > *From:* Amila Suriarachchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > *Sent:* 05 September 2007 05:36 > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: On ADB Binding > > > > what is the exception you are getting? > > here is the setter method generated > > > > public void setGEM_PostvDbl_Type(double param) { > > if (org.apache.axis2.databinding.utils.ConverterUtil.compare(param, > > "0.00 ") > 0) { > > this.localGEM_PostvDbl_Type = param; > > } else { > > throw new java.lang.RuntimeException(); > > } > > } > > > > and this calls ConverterUtil.compare method. > > > > public static double compare(double doubleValue, String value) { > > return doubleValue - Double.parseDouble(value); > > } > > > > so it basically use the parseDouble method of the Double class. > > > > Amila. > > > > On 9/4/07, Gudla, Natraj (GE Money, consultant) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > I am just running through another problem with min inclusive values > > > on double types. For declaration, > > > > > > > > > <xsd:simpleType name= "GEM_PostvDbl_Type" > > > > > > > <xsd:restriction base= "xsd:double" > > > > > > > <xsd:minExclusive value= "0.00"/> > > > > > > </xsd:restriction> > > > > > > </xsd:simpleType> > > > An xml schema instance value of 0.00 throws an error, saying it not a > > > valid value. 0.00 is a double value, and what could be the problem? > > > > > > Thanks > > > Natraj > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > *From:* Amila Suriarachchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > *Sent:* 04 September 2007 13:07 > > > *To:* [email protected] > > > *Subject:* Re: On ADB Binding > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/4/07, Gudla, Natraj (GE Money, consultant) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I am using AXIS2 1.2, Generated the data binding classes using > > > > WSDL2Java utility and i am trying to parse instance of an xml against > > > > the > > > > generated binding classes. I see a problem in which the xml > > > > restrictions are > > > > converted into code by AXIS utility. > > > > > > > > My XML schema condition : > > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- Positive Integer simple type --> > > > > > > > > <xsd:simpleType name="GEM_PostvInt_Type" > > > > > > > > > <xsd:restriction base="xsd:integer" > > > > > > > > > <xsd:minExclusive value="0" /> > > > > > > > > </xsd:restriction> > > > > > > > > </xsd:simpleType> > > > > > > > > *The corresponding code generated in a class* : > > > > > > > > /** > > > > > > > > * Auto generated setter method > > > > > > > > * > > > > > > > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] param > > > > > > > > * GEM_PostvInt_Type > > > > > > > > */ > > > > > > > > *public* *void* setGEM_PostvInt_Type(java.math.BigInteger param) { > > > > > > > > *if* (org.apache.axis2.databinding.utils.ConverterUtil.*compare*(param, > > > > "0") > 0) { > > > > > > > > *this*.localGEM_PostvInt_Type = param; > > > > > > > > } *else* { > > > > > > > > *throw* *new* java.lang.RuntimeException(); > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I check the api docs for ConverterUtil, which says this particular > > > > method returns a zero when values are equal, +ve when greater, -ve when > > > > lesser. If you look at my xml, i want zero to be mininclusive > > > > > > > > > > your given schema part declares it as > > > > > > <xsd:minExclusive value="0" /> > > > > > > Anyway if you don't have any special reason to use Axis2 1.2 better > > > switch to Axis2 1.3. > > > > > > Amila. > > > > > > meaning it should be allowed, in such a case why is the method > > > > checking for >0 and not >=0. > > > > > > > > I get an exception, as the control moves to the else part. i see the > > > > converterutil returns a 0 as input value is zerp and is being compared > > > > with > > > > zero. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Natraj > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > *From:* Gudla, Natraj (GE Money, consultant) > > > > *Sent:* 30 August 2007 11:48 > > > > *To:* '[email protected]' > > > > *Cc: *' [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > > *Subject:* RE: On ADB Binding > > > > > > > > Thanks Amila, It clarifies my doubt. We were a bit hesitant to go > > > > ahead with the ADB binding for the reasons on limitations stated in the > > > > documents. > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > *From:* Amila Suriarachchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > *Sent: *30 August 2007 11:44 > > > > *To:* [email protected] > > > > *Subject:* Re: On ADB Binding > > > > > > > > ADB does support restrictions and extensions. > > > > those documentation are bit obsolete. > > > > > > > > Amila. > > > > > > > > On 8/30/07, Gudla, Natraj (GE Money, consultant) < > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > The AXIS2 1.2 documentation states the ADB binding does not > > > > > support xml restrictions and extensions. Is it really true? When i > > > > > generated > > > > > Java classes from a WSDL, i see the restrictions on the types to be > > > > > properly > > > > > generated within the element classes. > > > > > > > > > > Following is part of my schema with restriction on the max length. > > > > > > > > > > <xsd:simpleType name="LN_PaymentProtection"> > > > > > <xsd:annotation> > > > > > <xsd:documentation>Elements of payment > > > > > protection represent the > > > > > protection types and can be only a string > > > > > type</xsd:documentation> > > > > > </xsd:annotation> > > > > > <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string"> > > > > > <xsd:maxLength value="2"></xsd:maxLength> > > > > > </xsd:restriction> > > > > > </xsd:simpleType> > > > > > > > > > > The code generated by AXIS ADB binding through WSDL2Java, check on > > > > > the max length within the code. > > > > > > > > > > public void setLN_PaymentProtection( java.lang.Stringparam) { > > > > > > > > > > if ((java.lang.String.valueOf(param).length() <= > > > > > 2)) { > > > > > this.localLN_PaymentProtection = param; > > > > > } else { > > > > > throw new java.lang.RuntimeException(); > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you see a point over here? what did the documentation exactly > > > > > mean? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > Natraj. > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Amila Suriarachchi, > > > > WSO2 Inc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Amila Suriarachchi, > > > WSO2 Inc. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Amila Suriarachchi, > > WSO2 Inc. > > > > > > > -- > Amila Suriarachchi, > WSO2 Inc. > > -- Amila Suriarachchi, WSO2 Inc.
