Amila Suriarachchi wrote:


On 10/18/07, *Chris Rose* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    I'm trying to tune the code generation and our WSDL for service methods
    with no parameters, which seems to be a fairly ill-documented process.
    I've been all over the place, and I see that there are some bugs in
    connection with this (AXIS-3199) which I've started watching, but I
    hoped that someone in the community at large can offer some insight into
    this.

    The method looks like this:
    public VersionBean getVersion ();

    Our WSDL (as noted in my comment on the bug report) looks like this:
    <xs:element name='getVersion'>
          <xs:complexType />
    </xs:element>

    <xs:element name='getVersionResponse' type='tns:getVersionResponse'/>

    <xs:complexType name='getVersionResponse'>
         <xs:sequence>
          <xs:element minOccurs='0' name='return' type='ns2:versionBean'/>
         </xs:sequence>
    </xs:complexType>

    <xs:complexType name='version'>
         <xs:sequence>
         <!-- ... various version fields -->
         </xs:sequence>
    </xs:complexType>

    <xs:complexType name='versionBean'>
         <xs:complexContent>
          <xs:extension base='ns1:version'>
           <xs:sequence/>
          </xs:extension>
         </xs:complexContent>
    </xs:complexType>

    <message name='Service_getVersion'>
       <part element='ns1:getVersion' name='parameters'/>
    </message>
    <message name='Service_getVersionResponse'>
       <part element='ns1:getVersionResponse' name='getVersionResponse'/>
    </message>

    <portType name='Service'>
       <operation name='getVersion' parameterOrder='getVersion'>
        <input message='ns1:Service_getVersion'/>
        <output message='ns1:Service_getVersionResponse'/>
       </operation>
    </portType>

    What I'd like to see in the generated ServiceSkeletonInterface is a
    getVersion() method with the same signature pattern:  No parameters.

    What I get, instead, is a getVersion (GetVersion getVersion) method,
    which is awkward, as we use a reflection-based tool to map these
    methods
    to their implementation counterparts.  Divergence between actual
    implementation and interface is a problem, then.


    I've tried removing the <input/> message in the operation element, but
    that results in no service whatsoever being generated.


this is a problem with the axis2 adb unwrapping. as a work around you can remove the
part element from the input message. (Then nothing goes on the soap boady).

That works from the service side; it generates interfaces that _look_ right, now, but when I invoke the methods in an axis2 client, I get this:

rg.apache.axis2.AxisFault: The endpoint reference (EPR) for the Operation not found is http://localhost:8080/ecourier/services/OperationsManagerService and the WSA Action = at org.apache.axis2.util.Utils.getInboundFaultFromMessageContext(Utils.java:486) at org.apache.axis2.description.OutInAxisOperationClient.handleResponse(OutInAxisOperation.java:343) at org.apache.axis2.description.OutInAxisOperationClient.send(OutInAxisOperation.java:389) at org.apache.axis2.description.OutInAxisOperationClient.executeImpl(OutInAxisOperation.java:211) at org.apache.axis2.client.OperationClient.execute(OperationClient.java:163) at com.aciworldwide.ecourier.management.ws.client.OperationsManagerServiceStub.findAllApplications(OperationsManagerServiceStub.java:763)
        at GetVersion.main(GetVersion.java:69)


How can I make the client build the correct message?

    A second problem with the code generation:  We run the schema compiler
    multiple times, because we isolate our web services into individual
    deployment aars which are then assembled at deployment time into a final
    set of services.  What we end up with is things like the aforementioned
    GetVersion class, but with an integer suffix that is... frustrating,
    especially when the fact that it's generated in a different package
    each
    time is taken into account.  It looks like the JavaBeanWriter is doing
    this, but the name generation behaviour in it is not amenable to
    overriding since it depends extensively on private variables.  Has
anyone got a better bean writer implementation they can suggest?

I fixed this issue. please have a look at with a nighly build.
    I'm currently using the ADB code generator, if it makes a difference.
    --
    Chris Rose
    Developer    Planet Consulting Group
    (780) 577-8433
    [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




--
Amila Suriarachchi,
WSO2 Inc.

--
Chris Rose
Developer    Planet Consulting Group
(780) 577-8433
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to