I'm not convinced that WSDL 2.0 is the future. There's still no sign
from Microsoft that they plan to implement support for it. Stick with
WSDL 1.1 for the immediate future.

Anne

On Nov 20, 2007 12:00 PM, Lawrence Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The WSDL 2.0 specification [1] became a W3C recommendation in June 2007.
> While WSDL 2.0 is the future it has not yet seen widespread adoption
> (although adoption is increasing, in part because of Axis2).
>
> For now I think your best bet is to use WSDL 1.1 and, if you'd like to
> future proof your app and be on the cutting edge, implement WSDL 2.0 as
> well. You might be interested in WSDL 1.1 -> 2.0 converters. Apache Woden
> [2] has one in SVN that's a bit out of date. There is also one available
> from the W3C [3] but it too looks to be out of date.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
> [2] http://incubator.apache.org/woden/
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/WSDLConvert.html
>
> Lawrence
>
>
>
>
> Mauro Molinari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 11/20/2007 03:36 AM
> Please respond to
> [email protected]
>
>
> To
> [email protected]
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: wsdl version
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Simon Steinacker ha scritto:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a general question: Which version of WSDL (1.1/2.0) is
> > recommended to be used? Is WSDL 2.0 already stable and applicable in a
> > critical business applications?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Lg Simon
>
> It may depend on the level of interoperability you want to have. I might
> be wrong, but I think .NET 1.1 is not compatible with WSDL 2.0.
>
> --
> Mauro Molinari
> Software Developer
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to