On Dec 3, 2007 8:16 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi Amila,
>
> I used a last weeks nightly build. I tried it again with the one from 3
> dec and indeed, a E suffix is appended to the classname. The generated
> code is for Simon's wsdl.

you mean still Axis2 appends the number prefixes to the end. can't you get
the same file
names as I have send to you?

And also if you want to change the package names you can use the
ns2p option.

Amila.

>
>
> Can you (or someone else) explain me the differences between the Axis
> and Axis2 approach in this? Because Axis seems to generate code which
> makes more sense than Axis2.
>
> Therefore I am using Axis now, while I would prefer to use Axis2. Maybe
> I should skip code generation and provide the classes myself, although
> this will be time-consuming.
>
> Thanks,
> Sietse
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Amila Suriarachchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 03 December 2007 13:27
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Strange generated java class names
>
>
> Are you sure you use the nighly build? check you Axis2 home here
> is the code I generated with the axis2 trunk.
>
> thanks,
> Amila.
>
>
>
> On Dec 3, 2007 4:49 PM, < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:
>
>
>        Hi Amila,
>
>        As I said, I have the same issue (also tried it with the nightly
> build).
>        You are right that the type and element name are the same.
>
>        The problem is that I can't change the wsdl file. I just need to
> deal
>        with this version. Strange in my opinion is that Axis 1.4 seems
> to
>        generate more suitable code. Is there are different approach
> taken (from
>        perspective of the complexType / element name issue)?
>
>        Some clarification would be appreciated.
>
>        Regards,
>        Sietse
>
>        ________________________________
>
>        From: Amila Suriarachchi [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
>        Sent: 03 December 2007 09:36
>
>        To: [email protected]
>        Subject: Re: Strange generated java class names
>
>
>
>
>
>        On Nov 23, 2007 11:41 AM, Simon Steinacker
>        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>               Yes, I am using Axis2.
>               This is the WSDL: http://pastebin.com/m1c167821
>
>
>
>        Please have a look at with a SNAPSHOT.  here the problem is you
> have an
>        element called
>        findDocumentsResponse and a complexType called
> findDocumentsResponse so
>        we have to rename one.
>
>        But I changed this in trunk like this. if both element and
> complex type
>        in same package  the element name would have an suffix E. and if
> they
>        are in different packages then have the original name.
>        thanks,
>        Amila.
>
>
>
>               Thanks,
>               Simon
>
>
>
>               Amila Suriarachchi wrote:
>               > Are you using Axis2?
>               > Can you send your wsdl?
>               >
>               > thanks,
>               > amila.
>               >
>               > On Nov 22, 2007 3:31 PM, Simon Steinacker
>               > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:
>               >
>               >> Hello,
>               >>
>               >> I have a wsdl and generate java classes out of it
> using the
>        wsdl2java
>               >> ant task. For example I have defined a response
> message named
>               >> 'FindDocumentsResponse'. Axis2 generates the java
> class for
>        that, but
>               >> performs a renaming into something like
>        'FindDocumentsResponse11'. So it
>               >> seems that it somehow appends a random number to the
>        generated response.
>               >> This only seems to be the case with service responses,
> since
>        parameters
>               >> are not affected by that phenomenon.
>               >> Is there a way to circumnavigate this issue? Because
> it is
>        rather
>               >> inconvenient to use?
>               >>
>               >> Thanks for your help!
>               >> Simon
>               >>
>               >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>               >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>               >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>               >>
>               >>
>               >>
>               >
>               >
>               >
>               >
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>               To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>               For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>        --
>        Amila Suriarachchi,
>        WSO2 Inc.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>        To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>        For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Amila Suriarachchi,
> WSO2 Inc.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
Amila Suriarachchi,
WSO2 Inc.

Reply via email to