On 4 Jan 2008, at 16:00, robert lazarski wrote:
I'm not completely clear on your setup but it seems to me you are
creating a ConfigurationContext yourself or are not loading the same
axis2.xml as you showed me - which is why putting axis2 in debug would
help as it would confirm the soapmonitorPhase is being loaded in
inflow.
The two configuration files (embedded and inside tomcat) are the
indeed the same.
Anywhich way though, what you are lacking is getting the
soapmonitorPhase configured in inflow - be it via axis2.xml,
ConfigurationContext etc. Are you able to engage and run the other
modules like logging and ping ok in your embedded setup?
Not the logging (it throws an exception saying it's not valid), but I
can successfully deploy a module of mine.
Can you load
the phases programtically in your embedded setup?
Yes.
See the unit tests
in the src tree for how to do phase loading programtically - sorry for
being a bit vague here but looking at the source is the quickest way
to tackle advance cases like this.
HTH,
Robert
Michele
On Jan 4, 2008 12:39 PM, Michele Mazzucco
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert,
I get that error if I run an embedded version of axis2. If I deploy
it to tomcat (clean setup) it works fine.
Jan 4, 2008 3:36:45 PM org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol init
INFO: Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8080
Jan 4, 2008 3:36:45 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina load
INFO: Initialization processed in 1011 ms
Jan 4, 2008 3:36:46 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService start
INFO: Starting service Catalina
Jan 4, 2008 3:36:46 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine start
INFO: Starting Servlet Engine: Apache Tomcat/6.0.14
Jan 4, 2008 3:36:46 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig
deployWAR
INFO: Deploying web application archive axis2.war
[INFO] Deploying module: addressing-1.3
[INFO] Deploying module: metadataExchange-1.3
[INFO] Deploying module: ping-1.3
[INFO] Deploying module: script-1.3
[INFO] Deploying module: soapmonitor-1.3
[INFO] script module activated
[INFO] HTTP Sender starting
[INFO] Deploying Web service: version.aar
Jan 4, 2008 3:36:50 PM org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol start
INFO: Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8080
Jan 4, 2008 3:36:50 PM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init
INFO: JK: ajp13 listening on /0.0.0.0:8009
Jan 4, 2008 3:36:50 PM org.apache.jk.server.JkMain start
INFO: Jk running ID=0 time=0/52 config=null
Jan 4, 2008 3:36:50 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina start
INFO: Server startup in 5161 ms
Any idea?
Michele
On 4 Jan 2008, at 14:50, robert lazarski wrote:
Michele, can you post your entire stacktrace please? I can't
match the
error you get with current svn. The error you are getting
indicates no
soapmonitorPhase in inflow, yet your axis2.xml does have it. So
sorry, no clear indication of the problem yet. You could try
putting
axis2 in debug to see the phases loaded, which may flush out the
error
by confirming the phase isn't loaded.
Alternatively, try out tcpmon ;-) .
Good luck,
Robert
On Jan 4, 2008 10:11 AM, Michele Mazzucco
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert,
if the module is globally engaged I get the error I mentioned in my
previous email. The same happens also if I "dynamically" engage the
module.
Michele
On 4 Jan 2008, at 12:01, robert lazarski wrote:
You need to engage the module. Search for:
<module ref="addressing"/>
Then in the same place, add:
<module ref="soapmonitor"/>
HTH,
Robert
On Jan 4, 2008 8:44 AM, Michele Mazzucco
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert,
in axis2 1.3 all the phases needed by the soap monitor module are
already included.
Michele
On 4 Jan 2008, at 11:07, robert lazarski wrote:
The exception is pretty self descriptive... show us the entire
axis2.xml and maybe we can help.
Robert
On Jan 4, 2008 7:39 AM, Michele Mazzucco
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I can't enage the soapmonitor module under Axis2 1.3 because
of the
following error
org.apache.axis2.phaseresolver.PhaseException: Did not
find the
desired phase 'soapmonitorPhase' while deploying handler
'InFlowSOAPMonitorHandler'.
My axis2.xml differs from the default one only because of
the NIO
transport listener.
Any idea?
Thanks,
Michele
---------------------------------------------------------------
--
--
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------
--
--
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
--
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------------
--
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]