Hi

The server, which I've wrote myself, uses the C++ based SimpleSOAP framework. It may be a fault with the server but I cant see what it may be.

This is the complete SOAP sent by Axis to call a method getString, which takes a single string parameter on an object called Test.. to me it looks perfectly OK..

POST /Test HTTP/1.0
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
Accept: application/soap+xml, application/dime, multipart/related, text/*
User-Agent: Axis/1.4
Host: 10.0.1.4:2000
Cache-Control: no-cache
Pragma: no-cache
SOAPAction: ""
Content-Length: 385

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/ envelope/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
                <soapenv:Body>
<getString soapenv:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/ encoding/">
                                        <name 
xsi:type="xsd:string">Andrew</name>
                        </getString>
                </soapenv:Body>
        </soapenv:Envelope>



Regards
Andrew



On 11 Jan 2008, at 19:52, Andreas Veithen wrote:


@Andrew: The value of the namespace prefix (soapenv or SOAP-ENV) indeed doesn't matter. The only thing that is relevant is the namespace URI it is bound to (http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/ envelope/). Do you have any idea what Web service framework the server uses?

Regards,

Andreas


On 11 Jan 2008, at 20:39, Alastair FETTES wrote:

Hi Andrew.

Theoretically soapenv should be perfectly acceptable. Irregardless of
what the prefix is, as long as the actual namespace is the same it
should recognize things appropriately.


Reply via email to