I guess it comes down to preference... Thanks, Keith.
On Jan 16, 2008 2:48 AM, Alick Buckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi keith, > > Which is the recommend option, inner classes or top level classes ? > > Are there any possible Java limit problems when WSDL2Java generates inner > classes from a complex WSDL ? > > > When would you decide to use the -u option ? > > I would like to be able to handle all WSDL documents the same way and > generate Java code using one set of WSDL2Java options. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: keith chapman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2008 11:45 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [axis2] why stub classes are generated as inner classes? > > Hi adrian, > > If you genarate code using the -u option it will Unpack the databinding > classes. By default they are genarated as inner classes. > > Thanks, > Keith. > > > On Jan 15, 2008 5:50 PM, Adrian Herscu < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > I wonder why stub classes are generated as inner classes instead of > > top-level classes. > > > > Any insights? > > > > TIA, > > Adrian. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > Keith Chapman > Software Engineer > WSO2 Inc. > Oxygenating the Web Service Platform. > http://wso2.org/ > > blog: http://www.keith-chapman.org -- Keith Chapman Software Engineer WSO2 Inc. Oxygenating the Web Service Platform. http://wso2.org/ blog: http://www.keith-chapman.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
