Hi Nandana:

I have a doubt about SAML Token.
Could I receive  from the STS service a SAML token without sign it?
I want STS service return a SAML token in clear over HTTPS. Is this
possible?

Thanks,
Nuria

2008/2/28, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi Nuria,
>
> > I've some questions about the ConfigurationContext
> > We have to create ConfigurationContext when we use WS-Security (Rampart)
> or
> > WS-Addressing because in these cases we need to use modules (rampart and
> > addressing).
>
> Yes, IFAIK when you are using Rampart you need to have a client
> repository which has Rampart module and you have to create a
> configuration context using that repository so that the Rampart module
> will be available to be engaged.
>
> > Could I manage soap header when I use the addressing module?
>
> What do you mean by managing the SOAP header ?
>
> thanks,
> /nandana
>
>
> > 2008/2/19, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> > > Hi Nuria,
> > >
> > > > A client accessing a WebService, and a SAML Authority (STS):
> > > >
> > > > 1) Have the client and the web Service to access to the same SAML
> > Authority?
> > > > (I have read anywhere that the SAML Authority only can be of STS
> type).
> > >
> > > Client needs access to the STS as it requires to get tokens from the
> STS.
> > And
> > > Client <---> STS and
> > > STS    <---> Web
> > > must trust each other. Sometimes service don't need to access the STS
> > > to validate the SAML token. In the examples of Rampart, service itself
> > > validates the SAML token and it doesn't access the STS. But there is a
> > > pre configured trust between the STS and the service.
> > >
> > > > 2) Covers RAHAS all the scenarios of SAML interaction between these
> > actors
> > > > or there are any limitations currently?
> > >
> > > RAMPART/RAHAS can use SAML token as a supporting token and as a
> > > protection token. So those two scenarios are pretty covered.
> > > WS Trust specification defines four bindings. Namely Issue , Validate,
> > > Renew, Cancel bindings. At the moment, Rampart only facilitate Issue
> > > and Cancel bindings. But we may be able to get the other two bindings
> > > working before the next release of Apache Rampart.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > /nandana
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > 2008/2/14, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Jens,
> > > > >   Not at the moment. But we will include a one before next
> release.
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks,
> > > > > nandana
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Jens Goldhammer
> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  Hello Nunny,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  is there any sample available where the SAML token can be used
> as a
> > > > > >  protection token for signing and encrypting messages?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  Thanks,
> > > > > >  Jens
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  Nunny wrote:
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  > Hi Nuria,
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  >> I've some doubts about SAML with axis2. I need to know if
> the
> > > > sample05
> > > > > >  >> covers all the the SAML cases.
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  > No, it covers only one scenario. For example, this uses SAML
> > token as
> > > > a
> > > > > >  > supporting token. There is another scenarios where SAML token
> can
> > be
> > > > > >  > used as a protection token where it will be used to sign and
> > encrypt
> > > > > >  > messages.
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  >> We first receive the SAML token response then we indicate,
> in
> > the
> > > > options
> > > > > >  >> the responseToken id
> > > > > >  >> I don't know where we are sending to the server the SAML
> > assertion
> > > > in the
> > > > > >  >> soapMessage
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  > When the id is set, Rampart message builders add the
> assertion to
> > the
> > > > > >  > security
> > > > > >  > header according to the security policy. If you monitor the
> > messages
> > > > > >  > exchanged
> > > > > >  > through TCPMon, then you can actually see the SAML assertion
> in
> > the
> > > > > >  > security
> > > > > >  > header of the SOAP request to the service.
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  >> Another thing is to know what are the requestSecurityToken
> > > > parameters.
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  > In the client, we set these parameters using RST template.
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  >     private static OMElement getRSTTemplate() throws
> Exception {
> > > > > >  >       OMFactory fac = OMAbstractFactory.getOMFactory();
> > > > > >  >       OMElement elem =
> > > > > >  >
> > fac.createOMElement(SP11Constants.REQUEST_SECURITY_TOKEN_TEMPLATE);
> > > > > >  >
> > TrustUtil.createTokenTypeElement(RahasConstants.VERSION_05_02,
> > > > > >  > elem).setText(RahasConstants.TOK_TYPE_SAML_10);
> > > > > >  >
> > TrustUtil.createKeyTypeElement(RahasConstants.VERSION_05_02,
> > > > elem,
> > > > > >  > RahasConstants.KEY_TYPE_PUBLIC_KEY);
> > > > > >  >
> > TrustUtil.createKeySizeElement(RahasConstants.VERSION_05_02,
> > > > elem, 256);
> > > > > >  >       return elem;
> > > > > >  >     }
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  > These parameters are defined in the WS Trust specification
> [1].
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  > /nandana
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  > [1] - specs.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/02/trust/WS-Trust.pdf
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  > http://nandana83.blogspot.com/
> > > > > >  > http://nandanasm.wordpress.com/
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  --
> > > > > >  View this message in context:
> > > > http://www.nabble.com/SAML-with-Axis2-tp15314610p15429275.html
> > > > > >  Sent from the Axis - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > http://nandana83.blogspot.com/
> > > http://nandanasm.wordpress.com/
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> http://nandana83.blogspot.com/
> http://nandanasm.wordpress.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to