File a bug report with Adobe. A SOAP stack should not barf on a valid NCName like "return".
Anne On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Chris Hyzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey, > Im using Axis2 (latest) and all defaults for inputs to Java2WSDL. I have a > simple service, and each operation has a "return" element in it. e.g. > > > <xs:element name="addMemberSimpleResponse"> > > <xs:complexType> > > <xs:sequence> > > <xs:element minOccurs="0" name="return" nillable="true" > type="ns:WsAddMemberResult"/> > > </xs:sequence> > > </xs:complexType> > > </xs:element> > > This means the XML that comes back looks like this: > > > > <soapenv:Body> > > <ns:addMemberSimpleResponse xmlns:ns="http://webservices.whatever/xsd";> > > <ns:return type="whatever.webservices.WsAddMemberResult"> > > <ns:resultCode xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; > xsi:nil="true" /> > > I have someone connecting to the web service using flash or flex, and there > is an XML -> object converter, which converts the XML into a hierarchy of > objects and fields. But since "return" is a keyword, it barfs. So, I was > wondering if there is a way (besides hand-editing the WSDL or using XSLT) to > customize java2wsdl to get that element to be generated as "the_return" or > something else besides "return". > > > Thanks! > Chris > > Here is the email from the user: > > Notice that the element name on line two of the response is named "return" > (forget about the "ns" namespace for now). This is perfectly legal XML but > "return" is a reserved word in most languages and attempts to access the > element directly cause problems when compiling the code. e.g. > --- BEGIN EXAMPLE FLASH CODE--- > var test : XML = XML("<top><body>hello world</body><return>good > bye</return></top>"); // casts string to xml > debugit.text = test.body; > debugit.text = test.child( "return" ); > --- END EXAMPLE FLASH CODE--- > All of the above code works fine. Notice that I access the "body" > element directly but accessed the "return" element using a child method. > The compiler complains if I attempt to use the syntax "test.return" or any > variation of it: "test.return.toString()". > Naming an element "return" is valid; I'm suggesting that it is probably not > good practice to use common reserve words as element names (or attribute > names for that matter). > ---- > > > > > ________________________________ > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it > now. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
