Hi Nadir,

Really thanks.

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Nadir Amra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Daniel,
>
> One for SOAP 1.1, one for SOAP 1.2, and one for REST-like Web services.
> You can suppress 1.2 and REST like SOAP bindings by turning a flag on or
> off in Axis2.xml,  as follows:
>
> - <!--
>  Following parameter will completely disable REST handling in Axis2
>  -->
>  <parameter name="disableREST" locked="true">true</parameter>
> - <!--
>  Following parameter will suppress generation of SOAP 1.2 bindings in
> auto-generated WSDL files
>  -->
>  <parameter name="disableSOAP12" locked="true">true</parameter>
>
>
>
> Nadir Amra
>
>
> "Daniel Woo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/20/2008 01:31:44 AM:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am a green babie with SOAP, my problem is that when I deploy a
> > POJO service class axis automatically generates a WSDL, but the
> > generated WSDL contains three bindings, eg
> >
> > <wsdl:service name="ProblemService">
> >     <wsdl:port name="ProblemServiceHttpSoap11Endpoint" binding="ns:
> > ProblemServiceHttpSoap11Binding">
> >         <soap:address location="http://16.158.65.18:
> > 80/axis2/services/ProblemService"/>
> >     </wsdl:port>
> >     <wsdl:port name="ProblemServiceHttpSoap12Endpoint" binding="ns:
> > ProblemServiceHttpSoap12Binding">
> >         <soap12:address location="http://16.158.65.18:
> > 80/axis2/services/ProblemService"/>
> >     </wsdl:port>
> >     <wsdl:port name="ProblemServiceHttpEndpoint" binding="ns:
> > ProblemServiceHttpBinding">
> >         <http:address location="http://16.158.65.18:
> > 80/axis2/services/ProblemService"/>
> >     </wsdl:port>
> > </wsdl:service>
> >
> > Then my question is that why three ports/bindings we need? I can't
> > see any difference between the three bindings. When a SOAP request
> > is incoming, which port/binding will be used?
> >
> > --
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Daniel
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Daniel

Reply via email to