Madhav wrote:
Hi Stefan,
Yes, I meant the same thing - ASCII characters (like String literals)
ultimately encoded as base64.
Samisa,
Did you mean the same thing which Stefan has mentioned or something else?
The same.
Samisa...
Thanks,
Madhav
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Chefo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Hi,
what do you mean by ASCII text content? Ascii encoded text file?
If so, in axis2 you have two options - either send it as base64 in
the message (where each base64 character obviously represents 6
bits) or send as a separate mime part (that would be the mtom) as
binary. The latter one will be obviously more efficient in terms
of message size since even with ascii-7 each char is 7 bits. If
compared to axis1 I'd guess it would be nearly the same as a soap
attachment - the only benefit you get is that it is more
convenient to work with the mtom than the swa...
Regards,
Stefan
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Madhav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Hi,
In Axis2, MTOM enables a more efficient transmission for
binary content. Is Axis2 more optimized for sending even a
ASCII text content than Axis1 ?
Thanks,
-Madhav
--
-Madhav
--
Samisa Abeysinghe
http://people.apache.org/~samisa/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
