How should I go about extracting wsa:MessageID from the client's asynchronous (call and transport with a separate listener) request and response? Am I responsible for correlating messages together or does axis2 offer such functionality as well?
Thanks, Dmitriy On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Dmitriy Frolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Thanks again for the information. I will post my findings based on POC. > > -Dmitriy > > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Deepal Jayasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> >> > Deepal, >> > Thanks for your quick response. It worked perfectly. I didn't >> > realize that configuration was initialized multiple times. >> Yes , whenever you create a new service client it create a new >> configuration context. >> > >> > I have another question. Is client listener implemented as a server >> > model? Meaning that once it receives a response it hands it over to >> > another thread for processing? >> Which listener you mean ? >> If you are talking about the client side HTTP listener , then the answer >> is yes. It is exactly a server. >> > >> > We are considering to use asynchronous client/server to reduce the >> > load on the client and improve its throughput. >> Yes that would be a good option , in fact Axis2 has support for NIO , so >> you might be able to use that too. >> > >> > In our case we have a client application that acts more or less as a >> > proxy and does very little processing itself. It delegate all of the >> > work synchronously to backend web services. Responses average from >> > several hundred milliseconds to several seconds with about 400 tps. >> > >> > Would you recommend asynchronous approach or could it potentially have >> > other side affects? All of the feedback will be much appreciated. >> I think asynchronous approach would be a good option for your >> application. However you can try both and let us know which one is >> better. Then we can learn from you . >> >> -Deepal >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Dmitriy >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Deepal Jayasinghe >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> > >> > Did you make two calls? >> > If so please try to share the same configuration context. >> > >> > -Deepal >> > >> > Dmitriy Frolov wrote: >> > > Hi all, >> > > I am trying to utilize axis2 asynchronous processing via callback >> > > mechanism and 2-way HTTP transport channels. The question I have >> is >> > > if client stub implementation is thread safe. Even though >> > Inderi have >> > > seen some reports that it is not, I was wong if anything changed >> in >> > > version 1.4.1. <http://1.4.1.> <http://1.4.1.> Assuming it is >> > not thread safe and I >> > > cannot share client stubs between multiple threads, is there way >> to >> > > reuse same separate response listener for all of the transactions? >> > > >> > > I have tried creating client stubs for each thread separately, >> > but ran >> > > into following exception: >> > > Sep 23, 2008 6:27:14 PM >> > > >> > >> org.apache.axis2.transport.http.server.DefaultConnectionListenerFailureHandler >> > > failed >> > > WARNING: Attempt number 1 of 10 to reestalish connection listener >> > > >> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > due to failure >> > > java.net.BindException: Address already in use: NET_Bind >> > > at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketBind(Native Method) >> > > at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.bind(PlainSocketImpl.java:398) >> > > at java.net.ServerSocket.bind(ServerSocket.java:331) >> > > at java.net.ServerSocket.<init>(ServerSocket.java:197) >> > > at java.net.ServerSocket.<init>(ServerSocket.java:109) >> > > at >> > > >> > >> org.apache.axis2.transport.http.server.DefaultConnectionListener.run(DefaultConnectionListener.java:72) >> > > at >> > > >> > >> edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1061) >> > > at >> > > >> > >> edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:575) >> > > >> > > >> > > Also if there is no way to use one listener for all of the >> > responses, >> > > are there any optimization techniques that can be utilized like >> > a pool >> > > of listeners for high volume system (~400tps)? Creating a >> listener >> > > every time could be rather expensive. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Dmitriy >> > >> > -- >> > Thank you! >> > >> > >> > http://blogs.deepal.org >> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > >> > >> >> -- >> Thank you! >> >> >> http://blogs.deepal.org >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >
