On 12/24/08, VeeR Six <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have the following definition in an XSD: > > <xsd:simpleType name="tariffID"> > <xsd:annotation> > <xsd:documentation>Standard tariff ID</xsd:documentation> > </xsd:annotation> > <xsd:restriction base="xsd:decimal"> > <xsd:totalDigits value="7"/> > </xsd:restriction> > </xsd:simpleType> > > When I generate the Java code I get the TariffID type as expected, but in > the generated setTariffID(int) method, there is no code that captures the > <xsd:totalDigits> restriction: > > /** > * Auto generated setter method > * @param param TariffID > */ > public void setTariffID(int param){ > this.localTariffID=param; > } > > If I then add either <xsd:pattern> or <xsd:minInclusive> and > <xsd:maxInclusive> to the XSD then these restrictions are captured in the > generated code. For example, this: > > <xsd:simpleType name="tariffID"> > <xsd:annotation> > <xsd:documentation>Standard tariff ID</xsd:documentation> > </xsd:annotation> > <xsd:restriction base="xsd:int"> > <xsd:totalDigits value="7"/> > <xsd:minInclusive value="0"/> > <xsd:maxInclusive value="9999999"/> > </xsd:restriction> > </xsd:simpleType> > > results in the following Java code being generated: > > /** > * Auto generated setter method > * @param param TariffID > */ > public void setTariffID(int param){ > if (org.apache.axis2.databinding.utils.ConverterUtil.compare(param, > "9999999") <= 0){ > this.localTariffID=param; > } > else { > throw new java.lang.RuntimeException(); > } > if (org.apache.axis2.databinding.utils.ConverterUtil.compare(param, "0") >>= 0){ > this.localTariffID=param; > } > else { > throw new java.lang.RuntimeException(); > } > } > > My question then is this, why is the <xsd:totalDigits> restriction not > captured in the code generated by Axis2? Is this expected behaviour or is > it a bug?
Bug. This is still not supported by ADB. please log a jira. Try to generate a code with other databiding framework like jaxbri or xmlbeans. thanks, Amila > > This is using v1.3, but I am seeing the same behaviour in v1.4.1 as well. > > Thanks, > Colin. > -- Amila Suriarachchi WSO2 Inc. blog: http://amilachinthaka.blogspot.com/
