> "... and has difficulty with structures such as XML Schema element > extensions and restrictions". > > has the same meaning with what I habe said. It can not dinamically adapt > itself to the changes on the schema definitions.
I'm not an expert of ADB, but this statement doesn't seem correct to me. The ADB documentation obviously refers to the XML Schema concepts of extension and restriction, which allow to derive new types from existing types. It has nothing to do with the behavior of ADB with respect to changes to the schema (which cause problems to any databinding framework). Probably ADB doesn't (fully) support extensions and restrictions on complex types, but for simple types this should work (but again, I'm not very familiar with ADB). Andreas
