On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:01 PM, robert lazarski
<robertlazar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:51 PM, vasu ts <vasu_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Binding: XML beans
>> Axis2 : 1.4.1 and 1.5.1
>>
>> My web service returns two attachments when an operation is executed. I am
>> able to read the first attachment but when I try to read the second
>> attachment its throwing "Attempted read on closed stream" exception. I
>> looked at wireshark's logs and I see all the binary data for the attachments
>> is being transferred correctly from the web service server to the client
>>
>> I looked through the user list archives and also tried several ways of
>> reading the attachments but every time I see the same issue. Below is the
>> sample code
>>
>> stub._getServiceClient().getOptions().setProperty(
>> Constants.Configuration.ENABLE_MTOM, Constants.VALUE_TRUE );
>>
>> MessageContext messageContext =
>> stub._getServiceClient().getLastOperationContext().getMessageContext(
>> WSDL2Constants.MESSAGE_LABEL_IN );
>>
>> Attachments attachments = messageContext.getAttachmentMap();
>> if ( attachments != null )
>> {
>> String[] contentIds = attachments.getAllContentIDs();
>> for ( int i = 0; i < contentIds.length; i++ )
>> {
>> DataHandler dataHandler = messageContext.getAttachment(
>> contentIds[i] );
>> String filePath = m_temp + contentIds[i];
>> try
>> {
>> FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(
>> filePath );
>> dataHandler.writeTo( fos );
>> fos.flush();
>> fos.close();
>> }
>> catch ( IOException ioe )
>> {
>> ioe.printStackTrace();
>> }
>> }
>> }
>>
>> any ideas on how I can resolve this issues?
>>
>> _______________
>
> Just a quick thought that may be way off: Not sure if
> messageContext.getAttachmentMap() works with xmlbeans. Might be ADB
> only. In fact, looking at the docs and from previous experience, I'm
> pretty sure SWA - you don't mention what you are using - is ADB only.
> Not sure about the jaxws stuff.
>
> Anyways, if you control the client, I'd just send the attachment as a
> String and accept the 30% bigger payload as unimportant if possible -
> often its not worth worrying about. Or switch to ADB on the server
> side. Or implement SWA or whatever for xmlbeans :-) .
>
> - R
>
Ah, MTOM. I'm 99% sure its ADB only.
- R
