HI!
.NET does everything automatically on the client side. If you for example deploy your
service on a web server that forces basic HTTP authentication, then .NET will use
this. You just have to set the credentials on the .NET side before the first method
call like this:
myGeneratedProxyClass.Credentials = new NetworkCredential("name", "password",
"domain");
When using basic authentication, .NET will send user="domain\name" and
password="password" in the HTTP header.
On the Axis side, I guess it depends on which web server you are using.
Regards,
Thomas
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sascha Kulawik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Montag, 18. Februar 2002 11:22
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Off topic .NET question
>
>
> Im currently working with ServerSite created GUID for the
> authentication
> of the Client.
> Currently I havent knew, that it would be possible, to use
> "normal" HTTP
> Authentication for authenticate a valid SOAP Client.
> Can anybody tell me, how this would be implemented either in a .NET
> Application for the Clientsite or a Java-Program with AXIS ?
>
> I was really surprised about AXIS - after working with Apache
> SOAP (and
> the ugly Descriptors) Im currently only deploying the
> Services with the
> jws extension - ans - it works. Also with WSDL and .NET Code - great
> work.
>
> On Mon, 2002-02-18 at 11:10, Thomas Börkel wrote:
> > HI!
> >
> > We do not use an Axis AuthHandler. We have our own
> transport (our own HTTP server), so that's no problem for us.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Thomas
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Adam.Leggett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Montag, 18. Februar 2002 10:54
> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > Subject: RE: Off topic .NET question
> > >
> > >
> > > Thomas,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the feedback. We have the exact same problem i.e
> > > PreAuthenticate=true does not appear to work for us either.
> > > In the meantime on the Java side I have created a version of
> > > my AuthHandler
> > > that parses the SOAP header instead for auth details. At this
> > > point we are
> > > at the stage of trying to create an .NET 'acceptable' WSDL
> > > with the correct
> > > <soap:header> element described in the operation. We are
> > > having some trouble
> > > with this so far.
> > >
> > > Im curious as to how you would make a handler force a 401 to
> > > be returned.
> > > What would be your approach to this?
> > >
> > > Adam
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Thomas Börkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 9:38 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: Off topic .NET question
> > >
> > >
> > > HI!
> > >
> > > All proxy classes derive from WebClientProtocol in .NET. And
> > > this class has
> > > a property named "PreAuthenticate" which should exactly do
> > > that. But it does
> > > not work here. Maybe it CANNOT work, because how should .NET
> > > know that you
> > > want basic authentication and not, for example, NTLM
> authentication?
> > >
> > > If you find out how to get this to work, I would be very
> > > interested. If not,
> > > Axis has to return 401 to make it work.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Thomas
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Adam.Leggett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Freitag, 15. Februar 2002 14:46
> > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > > Subject: RE: Off topic .NET question
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks thomas,
> > > >
> > > > But im slightly confused here. To authenticate to my AXIS
> > > > service(s) I have
> > > > a handler sitting in the request flow, that returns a SOAP
> > > > Fault in the SOAP
> > > > response if user cannot be authenticated. The AxisFault
> > > > generated in the
> > > > Handler is rethrown as ServletException so a 500 server error
> > > > is returned as
> > > > well.
> > > >
> > > > Can you not force the .NET to send basic auth 1st time
> > > > round..surely u can?
> > > > In my scenario, developers will know at design time that the
> > > > service is
> > > > password protected.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > >
> > > > Adam
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Thomas Börkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:04 PM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: RE: Off topic .NET question
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > HI!
> > > >
> > > > This (basic HTTP authentication) works here. .NET does
> not send the
> > > > authorization info with the first attempt, but it sends
> it with the
> > > > second attempt if the first attempt has been refused
> with HTTP error
> > > > 401 and the
> > > > correct challenge. It does the second attempt automatically,
> > > > if the first
> > > > one failed correctly. From then on, it sends the
> > > > authorization always at the
> > > > first attempt. This is normal HTTP client behavior AFAIK.
> > > > Your are doing it
> > > > correctly in your example, so it *should* work.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Thomas
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Adam.Leggett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Sent: Freitag, 15. Februar 2002 13:05
> > > > > To: Axis User ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > > > > Subject: Off topic .NET question
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Currently, I am working to interop with an MS colleague
> > > using .NET
> > > > > client with my AXIS service. I have a handler chain that
> > > uses LDAP
> > > > > to authenticate/authorize access to my deployed service. Works
> > > > > fine with my
> > > > > AXIS client. Trouble is, we cant seem to be able to get .NET
> > > > > to send the
> > > > > required Authorization: Basic pair in the HTTP header. When
> > > > looking at
> > > > > tcpmon it doesn't appear.
> > > > >
> > > > > Heres the c# client code we think should set the basic
> > > auth, but it
> > > > > doesn't.
> > > > >
> > > > > ICredentials credentials = new
> > > > > NetworkCredential("username","password","mydomain");
> > > > > serviceInstance.Credentials =
> credentials;
> > > > >
> > > > > serviceResponse response =
> > > > > serviceInstance.serviceMethod(serviceRequest);
> > > > >
> > > > > I know this is off topic, so any effort in answering
> this will be
> > > > > even more appreciated here than usual.
> > > > >
> > > > > TIA
> > > > >
> > > > > Adam Leggett
> > > > > UPCO
> > > > > Direct Line: 0113 20 10 631
> > > > > Fax: 0113 20 10 666
> > > > > <http://www.upco.co.uk>
> > > > > The contents of this email are intended for the named
> > > addressees and
> > > > > may contain confidential and / or privileged material. If
> > > > > received in error,
> > > > > please contact UPCO on +44 (0)113 20 10 600 and then delete
> > > > > the entire email
> > > > > from your system. Unauthorised review, distribution,
> > > > > disclosure or other use
> > > > > of this information could constitute a breach of
> confidence. Your
> > > > > co-operation in this matter is greatly appreciated.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> --
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
>
> Sascha Kulawik
> Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tel: +49 (172) 4318354
>
> Lustige Variablennamen erheitern den Programmierer
> Send with Evolution under Debian 3.0 (GNU/Linux 2.4.16-K7)
>
