HI! Please see my answer in the dev mailing list.
Regards, Thomas > -----Original Message----- > From: R J Scheuerle Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Samstag, 16. Februar 2002 18:17 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Axis Mailinglist > Subject: Re: Follow-Up to the email discussion about portType name vs. > service name > > > Thomas, > > If you would like to send me a patch to set the service stanza name, I > would be happy to commit it. > > Please make the options named "serviceStanzaName" with the one letter > option as "S", and > "portTypeName" with the one letter option as "P". (Please > make sure the > help messages, etc. > are changed.) > > The defaults for these options should be the current calculated names. > > Thanks, > > Rich Scheuerle > XML & Web Services Development > 512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115) > > > > > Thomas Börkel > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > "Axis Mailinglist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > cc: > > 02/14/2002 08:26 Subject: > Follow-Up to the email discussion about portType name vs. > service name > AM > > Please respond to > > axis-user > > > > > > > > > HI! > > I had an email discussion a few days ago with some of the > Axis developers > about the fact that I cannot set the service name to the same as the > portType name. > > And because I cannot choose the portType name (Axis always > sets it to the > class name), I can never set the service name to the class > name, as I'd > like to. > > I have already described, that this is bad if the client is > .NET, because > .NET does only take in account the service name when it > generates a proxy > class for that service. So we cannot have a proxy class with > the same name > as the Java class on the server side, which is pretty annoying > (inconsistency in our product, where Java is the server and > .NET is the > client). > > Is there anything you can do about this? I suggested to make > the portType > name freely configurable. That would be OK in our case, > because the class > name comes from the transport anyway. > > It would be very unpleasant if I had to compile a special > (patched) Axis > version for us because of this. > > Thanks! > > Regards, > Thomas > > > > >
