Adam,

I am not seeing this behavior.
Could you please verify this in the latest drop and send me an example
class.

Thanks

Rich Scheuerle
XML & Web Services Development
512-838-5115  (IBM TL 678-5115)


                                                                                       
                                     
                      "Adam Freeman"                                                   
                                     
                      <afreeman@lightsu        To:       R J Scheuerle 
Jr/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>      
                      rf.com>                  cc:                                     
                                     
                                               Subject:  RE: xsd:byte???               
                                     
                      02/25/2002 05:30                                                 
                                     
                      PM                                                               
                                     
                      Please respond to                                                
                                     
                      axis-user                                                        
                                     
                                                                                       
                                     
                                                                                       
                                     



Also, just to let you know.  It looks like there is a bug in the generation
of the wsdl file from the service.  This bug is related to the function
parameter names that get generated.  The first parameter is always called
"in1" in the wsdl file and the other parameters match the original
signature
but are moved over to the right one (the second parameter name really
should
be the name of the first parameter, the third parameter name should be the
second, etc.)

For example, the method -->

foo(int bar, String[] baz)

becomes in the wsdl file -->

foo(int in1, String[] bar)

but should probably be -->

foo(int bar, String[] baz)

Just trying to help out here,
Adam

-----Original Message-----
From: R J Scheuerle Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 2:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: xsd:byte???


I'll look into this if you send me your wsdl file describing  the service.

Thanks,

Rich Scheuerle
XML & Web Services Development
512-838-5115  (IBM TL 678-5115)



                      "Adam Freeman"
                      <afreeman@lightsu        To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      rf.com>                  cc:
                                               Subject:  xsd:byte???
                      02/25/2002 03:53
                      PM
                      Please respond to
                      axis-user





Hello,
I am trying to send over an array of bytes to an axis service.  I was
running out of memory and took a look at what was getting sent over the
wire and it looks like every single byte in the byte[] that is being sent
over is being marshalled as an xsd:byte type.  Is this a performance hit, a
joke or what??  Is this supposed to be an improvement over base 64
encoding/decoding?

<item xsi:type="xsd:byte">0</item>
    <item xsi:type="xsd:byte">0</item>
    <item xsi:type="xsd:byte">1</item>
    <item xsi:type="xsd:byte">-84</item>
    <item xsi:type="xsd:byte">0</item>
    <item xsi:type="xsd:byte">0</item>
    <item xsi:type="xsd:byte">0</item>
    <item xsi:type="xsd:byte">20</item>

HUH???  (Please reply to this address because I am no longer on the axis
user mailing list.)
- Adam






Reply via email to