Performance is an area we've been neglecting for the past few releases, and one which 
we plan to address after beta-2.  Right now we're doing way too much work during 
deserialization (recording SAX events, etc) in situations where we don't need to be, 
so I don't doubt that the RI is much faster.

The Sun RI also uses a custom pull-parser, which is pretty much the fastest parsing 
technology you can build.  We chose to go with standard JAXP (SAX) APIs to allow 
developer-friendliness and the ability to use whatever parser you already have kicking 
around, though we may revisit this in the future as well (esp if a standard pull 
parser API is developed as a JSR).

Try the tests again after our next run at performance optimization.

You are ALWAYS welcome to present your views, Pankaj. :)

--Glen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: KUMAR,PANKAJ (HP-Cupertino,ex1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 1:12 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Hi
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Deepth Dinesan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:31 AM
> > 
> > How does AXIS compare with Suns Web Services developer pack 
> ? in terms
> > of
> > - SOAP compliance
> > - Performance
> 
> This is an axis mailing list so I may not be welcome 
> presenting my views :-)
> 
> However, in my simple tests ( like get and echo of an int 
> array ) on the
> same machine, I have found Sun's JAX-RPC RI implementation to 
> be faster than
> Axis. I had conducted these tests with Axis-alpha3 and 
> JAX-RPC EA2 on my
> Athlon900Mz machine running Windows2000 with Sun's JDK1.3.1.
> 
> It wouldn't be fair to state the figures but if Axis community is
> interested, I could share my benchmark programs.
> 
> > - (Any known implementations ? )
> 
> HP ( My employer ) has a SOAP imploementation that uses Axis 
> client side
> code and adds more functionality such as XML-DSig, SOAP-SEC, 
> SOAP over SMTP
> etc. You can find more about it at
> http://www.hpmiddleware.com/products/hp_web_services/default.htm
> 
> Regards,
> Pankaj Kumar
> 

Reply via email to