I was referring to the web service support in WebLogic 6.
I didn't realize it had changed in WebLogic 7.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:24 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: BEA 7.0 Beta and Apache AXIS
>
> Hi !
>
> If you by force, means that it aint possible to create web
> services with
> "ordinary" java classes in web logic 7.0, that's
> not quite correct. I have made a really stupid Java class and
> published it
> as a web service. It was pretty straightforward.
>
> I haven't tried to develop a more complex class structure and
> that might be
> more difficult.
>
> "Volkmann, Mark"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
> "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Sascha Kulawikom><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc:
> 23.04.2002 17:25 Subject: RE:
> BEA 7.0 Beta and Apache AXIS
>
> Please respond to axis-user
>
> Here's one reason not to use the BEA implementation. I think
> they force you
> to implement your web services using either stateless session
> beans or JMS.
> With Axis your web services can be implemented with "ordinary" Java
> classes.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kulawik, Sascha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 9:36 AM
> To: Sascha Kulawik; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: AW: BEA 7.0 Beta and Apache AXIS
>
> Why do you use Axis if you have BEA Weblogic 7.0 ?
> BEA has his own implementation of SOAP, I thought... (And
> its REALLY easy
> to use)
***********************************************************************************
WARNING: All e-mail sent to and from this address will be received or
otherwise recorded by the A.G. Edwards corporate e-mail system and is
subject to archival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to,
someone other than the recipient.
************************************************************************************
