Can't help much with the Mozilla bit, but for DOM check out the following: Sun Tutorial:
http://java.sun.com/webservices/docs/1.0/tutorial/doc/JAXPDOM.html For server-side Java, consider using JDOM, a simpler implementation that is DOM-like, but a bit more "comforatble" for the Java world ... written by Jason Hunter and Brett McLaughlin. www.jdom.org HTHAL, Mike ---- Original Message ---- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Axis and Mozilla SOAP Javascript Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:55:34 -0400 >I'm trying to do the same thing. I did it at my previous job so I >know it >is doable but I cannot find any good reference on it. > >We created XML DOMs from scratch on the client side and sent that XML >via >soap to the SOAP server. The soap server then split up the XML and >handled >it appropriatly, using server side JScript. I am attempting to do >the front >end the same way but Java on the server side. > >The main bits of information I'm missing on the client side (they >were >obfuscated with the code I was working on): > >* How do you create an XML DOM in IE/Netscape (I know it is different >syntax >to create them but after that they use the same code) > >* How do I send the XML to the client and get the response back. > >On the server side I'm having trouble finding the reference I need as >well. >I cannot find documentation on how I get the XML and access it via >the DOM >(document.getElementByTagName("..."), document.firstChild, and all >that). > >If anyone has any directions they can point me in I would be most >greatfull. >I've been scouring google for about 3 days now. > >-Chris > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:villardml@;free.fr] >Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 6:14 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Axis and Mozilla SOAP Javascript > > >Hi, > I'm trying to invoke a web service from javascript using the >mozilla >implementation (the only one? I don't know). But mozilla don't send >the >SOAPAction header when invoking the service, and therefore axis is >not >happy. Is >someone here has encountered the same problem? >Thanks >Lionel >
