----- Original Message -----
From: "Anne Thomas Manes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 18:55
Subject: RE: UPNP


> I haven't heard anything about UPNP for about a year. The only device that
I
> ever heard of that was UPNP certified was the Intel AnyPoint Networking
> Gateway
(http://www.samsungelectronics.com/homenetwork/news/news_005.html).
>
> UPNP definitely predates WSDL.

There is that UPNP stuff in winxp, which means that MS secretly have a fifth
SOAP stack to go with the two .net implementations, MSSTK and ATL server.
But I havent seen any UPNP devices. I could find out what is going on in the
printer area, but then I wouldnt be able to talk about it. From what I
recall, there were issues with UPnPs chattiness counting against its
usability in the office (there were no aggregation of discovery mcasts via
discovery servers, a la SLPv2), leaving the home. But in the home LAN hosted
printers are a rarity, USB to the home PC is the centre of attention.

So I'll ignore Upnp. Its a shame, because if it was real WSDL/SOAP with the
discovery mechanism decoupled from the interaction, a UPNP printer would
just be a printer service on the lan that you could find through discovery,
UDDI (!), hardcoding, etc, and talk direct to it from your app if you so
chose.

-steve



Reply via email to