Title: RE: WSDL of java.* types

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 2:13 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: WSDL of java.* types
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Karsten D�sterloh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 02:39
> Subject: WSDL of java.* types
>
> > In particular, the following class is *not* exportable as a
> web service:
> >
> > public class test
> > {
> >   public test() {}
> >   public void Func(java.lang.Math m) {}
> > }
> >
>
> What do you expect when a perl program calls this? Or a C
> application? Or
> anything other than Java? Or even a different version of Java
> from yours?

This isn't a particularly good example because the Math class has no fields.  If it did, what I'd expect is that the Math type would be described as a WSDL type.  Clients written in languages other than Java would run a WSDL2Java-like tool for their language on the WSDL that would generate code for representing Math objects in their language.



***********************************************************************************
WARNING: All e-mail sent to and from this address will be received or
otherwise recorded by the A.G. Edwards corporate e-mail system and is
subject to archival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to,
someone other than the recipient.
************************************************************************************

Reply via email to