Actually 10-15x faster seems to be only in the WASP advertising in actuality it's only 2-3x.
-----Original Message----- From: Luís Fraga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 8:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Axis performance in compare with XRPC (reference implementation from SUN)! 10-15x faster than Axis!!??? I will have to check that! What are your toughts regarding these performance issues? Luís Anne Thomas Manes wrote: >You'll find Axis performance much faster than Sun's JAX-RPC RI. It also >provides much easier tools. But the commercial implementations are much >faster and easier still. There are free versions available for both GLUE and >WASP. GLUE Standard is always free. The footprint is tiny, too. See >http://www.themindelectric.com. WASP is always free for development, and you >can get a free deployment license for a single CPU (multi-CPUs require >payment). See http://www.systinet.com. These two implementations offer the >best performance (10-15x faster than Axis) and the best tools. > >Anne > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Armond Avanes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 2:45 AM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Axis performance in compare with XRPC (reference implementation >>from SUN)! >> >> >>Hi SOAP Folks, >> >>Anyone has compared the performance of these two implementations >>(Apache's Axis and Sun's XRPC) in a real environment?! >> >>FYI, I'm in the phase of replacing the communication layer (which is >>reference implementation of SUN) of the application, I'm working on, >>with Axis. Sun's implementation generates so many classes and uses many >>libraries so causes the whole result (application jars, ear's, war's, >>etc) to be very huge. Another side effect is the build time of the >>project, which is really much! >> >>I need all your ideas/suggestions/comments in this regard. >>What problems may I get into with Axis? How's the performance in compare >>with other implementations? Is there any better alternative than Axis >>(free for sure!) And so on... >> >>Best Regards, >>Armond >> >> >> >> > > > > >
