I sound also mention that Macromedia and Borland both distribute Axis in their products, too.
Anne > -----Original Message----- > From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Axis vs. IBM WSTK vs. Sun Java WSDP > > > WSTK includes the binaries (not source) for Axis as well as wsdl4j, > lotusXSL, uddi4j, and wsil4j. See > http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/aw.nsf/reqs/webservicestoolkit. > > Anne > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Daniel Elenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:45 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Axis vs. IBM WSTK vs. Sun Java WSDP > > > > > > Oh. So WSTK is a proper superset of Axis? > > > > /Daniel > > > > On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 22:03, Doug Davis wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes and Yes. > > > -Dug > > > > > > > > > Barry Levinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/12/2003 04:00:35 PM > > > > > > Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > cc: > > > Subject: Re: Axis vs. IBM WSTK vs. Sun Java WSDP > > > > > > > > > Doesn't IBM WSTK use Axis? Isn't Axis distributed with WSTK? > > > > > > --Barry > > > > > > Anne Thomas Manes wrote: > > > > > > >Sun's implementation is not open source. It is a reference > > implementation. > > > >The source is available, but it isn't open source. It is > > subject to Sun's > > > >source license. > > > > > > > >The original Apache SOAP project is based on IBM's SOAP4J submission. > > > SOAP4J > > > >was the first published SOAP implementation. It had some > architectural > > > >limitations, so about 2 years ago, the SOAP team decided to > > initiate a new > > > >project (Axis). Sun's JAX-RPC project didn't start until a few months > > > later. > > > > > > > >IBM WSTK is alphaWorks technology. alphaWorks technology is > > free, but not > > > >necessarily open source. WSTK runs on either WebSphere or Tomcat. > > > > > > > >Anne > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > > > >>From: Daniel Elenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > >>Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:14 PM > > > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>Subject: RE: Axis vs. IBM WSTK vs. Sun Java WSDP > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>And are Sun's and IBM's runtime environments not open source? > > Does WSTK > > > >>require WebSphere to run? If Sun's runtime is open source, > what is the > > > >>motivation for this project? > > > >> > > > >>/Daniel > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 18:04, Anne Thomas Manes wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>IBM WSTK is based on Axis. > > > >>>Both Axis and JWSDP support the JAX-RPC API. The tools are a > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>bit different, > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>though. When you build a client or service with one, you > > must deploy it > > > >>>using that system's runtime environment. For that reason, > > I'd recommend > > > >>>using Axis. > > > >>> > > > >>>Anne > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>>>-----Original Message----- > > > >>>>From: Daniel Elenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > >>>>Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:50 AM > > > >>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>>>Subject: Axis vs. IBM WSTK vs. Sun Java WSDP > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>>Hi All! > > > >>>> > > > >>>>I am new to web services, and I'd like to ask a newbie > > question. I am > > > >>>>doing a project about integrating WSDL/SOAP with JXTA > (www.jxta.org). > > >>>> > > >>>>How does Axis compare with IBM's Web Services Toolkit and > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>Sun's Java Web > > >> > > >> > > >>>>Services Developer Pack? Are they all compatible somehow? > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>What features > > >> > > >> > > >>>>differentiate them? As I understand, the current JXTA-SOAP > > >>>>implementation is based on Axis, so I'll probably end up > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>using that, but > > >> > > >> > > >>>>it would be interesting to know the differences. > > >>>> > > >>>>Regards, > > >>>>-- > > >>>>Daniel Elenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>-- > > >>Daniel Elenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Daniel Elenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
