Going back (way back) into this thread -
Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
"We had another discussion on this list [1] recently about performance.
The JAX-RPC spec forces the use of SAX, which isn't the most efficient
way to parse structured messages.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-user&m=104429792424850&w=2"
In the email referred to, Dennis Sosnoski says:
"For instance, JAX-RPC is based on SAX parsing which is
pretty horrible for structured data - you have to maintain state in your
handlers,..."
But the JAX-RPC spec says:
"Note that the type mapping framework does not require an implementation
of a JAXRPC runtime system to use a specific XML processing mechanism.
For example, a JAXRPC implementation may use a streaming pull parser for
performance efficient XML processing. DOM or SAX based deserializers may
still be developed and plugged into the extensible type mapping
framework provided by this JAX-RPC implementation." (jaxrpc-1.0-fr,
Section 15.2)
So my question is - is the spec right here? Or are Dennis and Anne
referring to some intrinsic difficulty with the JAX-RPC apis that
prevent them being used on top of XMLPULL?
Cheers,
Baz
- Why Pull-Parser faster ? - Still NO answer Ricky Ho
- Why should include encodingStyle wirh... Jue \(Jacky\) Shu
- Re: Why Pull-Parser faster ? - Still ... Aleksander Slominski
- Re: Why Pull-Parser faster ? - Still ... Tom Myers
- JBoss-net (Axis) <-> MS.Net... Ricardo Ramalho
- Re: Are JAXRPC, XMLPull incompati... Brian Ewins
- Re: Are JAXRPC, XMLPull incom... Dennis Sosnoski
- Re: Why Pull-Parser faster ? - St... Ricky Ho
- RE: Why Pull-Parser faster ? - Still ... KUMAR,PANKAJ (HP-Cupertino,ex1)