Hi Toshi,
As of now I am not a axis-dev subscriber.. but i will soon.
Sreekant
Toshiyuki Kimura wrote:
> Hi, Sreekant:
>
> Sure. I'm also a subscriber of axis-dev-ml. Are you, too?
>
> Before we move to axis-dev list ...
>
> Please let me notify all of axis-users that jax-rpc handler
> is an important arcitecture. And I want to suggest you pay
> attention to the difference between 'Axis specific handlers'
> and 'jax-rpc handlers' when you just say *'Handler'*.
>
> The following section show us the starting point of this
> activity, which is a Q&A with an axis committee.
>
> .........*.........*.........*.........*.........*.........*.........*
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: Tom Jordahl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 12:01 AM
> | To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> | Subject: RE: gzip support
> |
> | We will always support the JAX-RPC way of doing things,
> | but that doesn't mean that Axis specific handlers aren't
> | a good thing.
> |
> | Pick whichever one you think will get the job done.
> | I would prefer JAX-RPC is you think you would ever want
> | this handler to move to some other engine.
> |
> | Please consider contributing the handlers to the project
> | if/when you complete them, I am sure many other may want
> | to do a similar thing.
> |
> | --
> | Tom Jordahl
> | Macromedia Server Development
> |
> | >-----Original Message-----
> | >From: Toshiyuki Kimura [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | >Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 3:53 AM
> | >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | >Cc: Tom Jordahl
> | >Subject: RE: gzip support
> | >
> | >Hi Tom,
> | >
> | > I have a question for this matter.
> | >
> | > AXIS has two implementations of "Handler"; one is "AXIS Handler"
> | >as the AXIS original, and the other is "JAX-RPC Handler" as the
> | >standard implementation in accordance with JAX-RPC ver 1.0 spec.
> | >
> | > The AXIS original architecture has extensibility as you say.
> | >However, it doesn't follow the JAX-RPC ver 1.0 spec. at the point
> | >of "Handler implementation", currently.
> | >
> | > How do you think what AXIS should choice of the future style
> | >for the AXIS handler implementations ? (i.e. Both AXIS original
> | >and JAX-RPC , or JAX-RPC only, or ... ???)
> | > The AXIS Project has already decided the direction ?
> | >
> | >Regards,
> | >
> | > Toshiyuki Kimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | > R&D Headquarters
> | > NTT DATA Corp.
> .........*.........*.........*.........*.........*.........*.........*
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Toshi (Toshiyuki Kimura) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> R&D Headquarters
> NTT DATA Corporation
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sreekant Thirunagari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 11:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Handler chain implementation
>
> Hi Toshi,
>
> This is exactly what i wanted to configure, index of the handler
> user wants to start in case of 'return false'. You got me. Instead
> of storing class name, index makes things lot easier. Ofcourse wsdd
> gives more flexibility. I am not sure if we need to support '-1'
> option you mentioned. I think we have to move this thread to
> developer list so that we can take the opinion of other axis
> handler developers. Ultimately we have to fill this gap of non
> conference with spec completely (WSDD, handlerchainimpl ... ).
>
> Regards,
> Sreekant
