Because I want to filter the properties being marshalled to the client -- I've handled 
it anyway via the concept of a "NullDeserializer".

Cory

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 4:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: serialize but not deserialize


Why are you using custom de/serializers?  All you have to do is fool Axis
into believing the class to be transformed is a JavaBean.

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Cory Wilkerson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 3:55 PM

There are cases when I'll need to serialize an element to a consumer but
never have to deserialize that same element.  Using custom serializers and
deserializers, it appears as though I'm forced to provide factories that at
the very least will return dummy representations of deserializers so that
typeMapping deployments work correctly.  Am I missing anything here or is
this the way it has to be?

Thanks,
Cory


Reply via email to