Hi, I met two different formats of SOAP response in different implementations, I would like to know if they are both valid and wch oneis more usual or advisable?
1) <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <e:Envelope xmlns:e="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:wn0="http://systinet.com/xsd/SchemaTypes/" xmlns:wn1="http://idoox.com/interface"> <e:Body> <wn0:string_Response i:type="d:string">Hello, Domi!</wn0:string_Response> </e:Body> </e:Envelope> 2) <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <e:Envelope xmlns:e="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:wn0="http://systinet.com/xsd/SchemaTypes/" <e:Body> <string_Response xmlns="http://idoox.com ....">Hello, Domi!</string_Response> </e:Body> </e:Envelope> Some clients, like MS Infopath do no support the second fashion ???? Thanks Dominique
