RE: encoding.ser.castor

[Hansen, Richard]

Too bad the wsdl2java ant task does not support the noWrapped param (at least in v1.1). -----Original Message----- From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 8:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: encoding.ser.castor As I think I mentioned before, there's no difference between Wrapped and Document style on the wire, and it causes only subtle differences in the naming conventions in the WSDL. .NET doesn't even notice the difference between the two. By default, the .NET WSDL compiler (wsdl.exe) generates the equivalent of a Wrapped interface from either style.   I recommend that you always design your WSDL using the Wrapped naming conventions. That means the input message element name must be the same as the operation name. Doing so gives you more options. If you prefer to use document style (using a JavaBean on your client rather than parameters), you can request "unwrapped" when you run WSDL2Java. The converse doesn't work.   Anne ----- Original Message ----- From: Tony Opatha To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 3:19 PM Subject: Re: encoding.ser.castor Thanks for clarifyin the types of message styles supported in AXIS.   It seems then there are three different message styles for doc/literal:   - Wrapped - Document - Message   It seems that Wrapped and Document styles of messaging both require AXIS serialization.   Is Wrapped thye more commonly used doc/literal style since it produces parameterized interfaces? Wouldn't wrapped style be most suitable with .NET web services that are by default doc/lit style WSDL interfaces?   Thank you very much.             Anne Thomas Manes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David, Axis defines 4 message styles, which get specified either in Java2WSDL or the WSDD. These message styles should not be confused with WSDL message styles. These styles tell Axis three things: - what type of WSDL style to use (rpc/encoded vs doc/literal) - what type of service provider to use (java:RPC or java:MSG) - what type of interface to generate (parameterized, non-parameterized, or none) If you want Axis to hand you a DOM element so that you can do your own serialization, then you should use the java:MSG provider -- which means you should use the Axis MESSAGE style. The Axis message styles are: RPC: - produces WSDL style RPC/encoded - uses WSDD provider="java:RPC" (Axis performs serialization) - produces a parameterized RMI interface WRAPPED: - produces WSDL style doc/literal - uses WSDD provider="java:RPC" (Axis performs serialization) - produces a parameterized RMI interface DOCUMENT: - produces WSDL style doc/literal - uses WSDD provider="java:RPC" (Axis performs serialization) - produces a non-parameterized RMI interface (takes a JavaBean) MESSAGE: - produces WSDL style doc/literal - uses WSDD provider="java:MSG" (delivers a DOM element) - doesn't produce an interface (client uses call object) Anne ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Kocher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Anne Thomas Manes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "James Cowan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 11:20 AM Subject: Re: encoding.ser.castor > Thanks for the reply. I'ma bit confused with the vocabulary. Do you mean with > a MESSAGE style service the same as with doc/literal ? > > If I understand you correctly you think that it might be easier with a> document style service (instead of rpc) to send the soap message and then > deserialize with castor myself. Right? > > Also, is the example distributed with axis in samples/message supposed to be a > documentstyle service? > > Thanks for clarification. > -David > > On Monday 04 August 2003 13:20, Anne Thomas Manes wrote: > > Castor performs translations from xsd types to Java objects. Be aware that > > if you're using SOAP encoding, you don't have a schema for the SOAP > > message. I notice that you're using SOAP encoding. I suggest you try using > > doc/literal instead. You may have to resort to using a MESSAGE style > > service, though. > > > > And by the way, in regard to the referenced documentation... The JAX-RPC > > spec defines type mapping rules for SOAP encoding. It doesn't define > > mapping rules for doc/literal (types).> > > > Anne > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "David Kocher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: "James Cowan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 6:49 AM > > Subject: Re: encoding.ser.castor > > > > > On Thursday 31 July 2003 18:47, James Cowan wrote: > > > > I am interested in this as well. I use the Castor xsd compiler a lot - > > > > it > > > > > > generates really nice code. > > > > > > That's what is my impression as well. If I could use the castor generated > > > > code > > > > > on the axis side as well this would be very convenient. Otherwise I > > > > suppose I > > > > > might be forced to write a bridge between the axis and castor objects. ! > > > > > > > I do not really understand how you can use the castor compiler > > > > alongside the wsdl compiler - surely you can only use one or the other > > > > or am I missing the point? > > > > > > That's my point. I would like to use only castor because it does a good > > > > job in > > > > > translating the xsd schema rules. Becaue the castor objects do follow the > > > bean pattern it should be possible to integrate them into axis as > > > > described > > > > > in > > > > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/~checkout~/xml-axis/java/docs/user-guide. > >h tml#DataMapping > > > > > Someone out there who can explain what I am missing that my typeMapping > > > > below > > > > > doesn't work? > > > > ! > > Thanks a lot > > > - David > > > > > > > James > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 4:05 PM > > > > Subject: Re: encoding.ser.castor > > > > > > > > > David, > > > > > > > > > > I'm about to do this myself, with the exception of using my own set > > > > > of CastorSerializer classes so that it will look for my custom > > > > > mapping. > > > > So > > > > > > > I'm very interested in this topic. I wonder if the encodingStyle > > > > should > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > somthing else? > > &! gt; > > > > > > > Have you confirmed that the (un)marshalling process is successful > > > > > external to the serialization framework? I've noticed that the > > > > default > > > > > > > binding for source code generation in Castor does not always (in my > > > > case > > > > > > > never) > > > > > > > > matches > > > > > > > > > with the default mapping. But maybe that is because I don't let it > > > > add > > > > > > > Castor code to my JavaBeans. > > > > > > > > > > Please keep us posted on your progress! > > > > > > > > > > Cheers. > > > > > Steve Maring > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > David Kocher > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] rve.ch> cc: > > > > > 07/31/2003 10:02 Subject: > > > > > > > > encoding.ser.castor > > > > > > > > > AM > > > > > > > > > > Please respond to > > > > > axis-user > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi axis-users, > > > > > yet another question (...) I'm just tinkering around > > > > > with the org.apache.axis.encoding.ser.castor.* classes. I have type > > > > mappings > > > > > > > in my axis depl! oyment descriptor like the following: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > xmlns:ns=" > > > > > http://www.suva.ch/schemas/20030722/SalaryDeclaration" > > > > > qname="ns:CompanyType" > > > > > > > > type="java:ch.itserve.lohnstandard.piv.CompanyType > > > > > > > > > " > > > > > serializer > > > > > ="org.apache.axis.encoding.ser.castor.CastorSerializerFactory" > > > > > deserializer > > > > > ="org.apache.axis.encoding.ser.castor.CastorDeserializerFactory" > > > > > encodingStyle=" > > > > > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" > > > > > /> > > > > > > > > > > All beans are autogenerated classes from the castor. When trying to > > > > &g! t; deploy the > > > > > service with the AdminClient I get a classcastexception I cannot > > > > > > > > understand > > > > > > > > > [java] Exception:: > > > > > org.apache.axis.deployment.wsdd.WSDDException: > > > > > java.lang.ClassCastException > > > > > [java] java.lang.ClassCastException > > > > > [java] at > > > > org.apache.axis.encoding.ser.BaseSerializerFactory.createFactory(BaseSerial > > > > > >i zerFactory.java:257) > > > > > > > > > [java] at > > > > org.apache.axis.deployment.wsdd.WSDDService.deployTypeMapping(WSDDService.j > > > > > >a va:549) > > > > > > > > > Is it supposed to work? > > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > > -David &! gt; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > > The information transmitted is intended only for the person > > > > or > > > > > > > entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential > > > > > and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, > > > > > dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in > > > > > > > > reliance > > > > > > > > > upon, this information by persons or entities other than the > > > > > intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in > > > > > > > > error, > > > > > > > > > please contact the sender and delete ! the material from any > > > > > computer. > Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software