Here's some more information on this from TCPMonitor.

Request:

POST /axis/services/IncidentService HTTP/1.0
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
Accept: application/soap+xml, application/dime, multipart/related, text/*
User-Agent: Axis/1.2dev
Host: 127.0.0.1
Cache-Control: no-cache
Pragma: no-cache
SOAPAction: ""
Content-Length: 493

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
 <soapenv:Body>
  <ns1:findProductIncidentsWithEddress
soapenv:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/";
xmlns:ns1="http://soapinterop.org/";>
   <arg1 xsi:type="xsd:string">gene</arg1>
  </ns1:findProductIncidentsWithEddress>
 </soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>

Response:

HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 19:13:34 GMT
Server: Apache Coyote/1.0
Connection: close

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
 <soapenv:Body>
  <soapenv:Fault>
   <faultcode>soapenv:Server.userException</faultcode>
   <faultstring>java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException</faultstring>
   <detail/>
  </soapenv:Fault>
 </soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>

The 500 error is just typical of a fault, right?

Does anyone see anything that's wrong with the request that could generate
the fault/exception?

I'm totally stuck on this...

Thanks,

Adhamh


On 8/8/03 9:00 AM, "Adhamh Findlay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 8/8/03 8:53 AM, "Jonathan Melvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> I use JNI in Axis in Jboss without any particular problems.
>> Post the full exception you are getting
>> 
> 
> 
> Here it is....  In all its glory...  I'm try to modify the axis source, now
> to call getTargetException() on so that I can get more detail.
> 
> Adhamh
> 
> 

Reply via email to