Mike, Can you cut and paste the part of the WS-I profile that recommends RPC/literal? I missed that when I read it.
Its interesting that the JAX-RPC spec says that an implementation may support RPC/literal but doesnt have to. That right there would be enough for me to never implement RPC/literal using Java. It seems to me that the SOAP spec needs a SOAPOperation part that loosely (more loosely than rpc with methods and parameters but tighter than the "wrapper" element convention that is not defined anywhere). The SOAPOperation section of the SOAP message would provide the operation to be performed and the expected return "message". The SOAP body would simply have the document/literal data and would not have anything about operations. In other words I want the loose coupling of document/literal with a more defined way to realize the operation to be performed and the expected return document/literal message. The "wrapper" element way of handling this is a convention that is not defined anywhere in the WSDL spec or the SOAP spec. Its a programmer way of handling the problem not a standard. I guess one way to avoid all of this is to have one document/literal web service per operation but I dont think anyone recommends that. Keith -----Original Message----- From: Michael Woinoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 5:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: How to define document/literal service with multiple operatio ns Hi, Ranjith. What you are suggesting is basically an rpc-literal operation. Several postings to this list have mentioned that rpc-literal is not (yet) supported by all Web service implementations (even though it is recommended in the WS-I Basic Profile), so I'd prefer to avoid rpc-literal for interoperability. That leaves using SOAPAction for routing document-literal operations. It sounds like the HTTPActionHandler should do it but I haven't figured out how to configure it. Thanks, Mike PILLAI,RANJITH (HP-PaloAlto,ex1) wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I hope you are using Message style service here. > I don't how to add this to axis client. But u can edit your SOAP message > directly if you are using tcpmon. So in tcpmon add another element(your > operation name)directly under soap body. For some reason axis client is not > doing this(if you find please let me know too :)). > > For eg: if you look into your tcpmon, you can see under soap body, your > document is appended directly with out a wrapper element. > > <soapenv:Body> > <your document> > </soapenv:Body> > > so edit it like this... > > <soapenv:Body> > <your-method-name> > <your document> > </your-method-name> > </soapenv:Body> > > then resend tcpmon. > > This way you can invoke any method in your webservice. Unfortunately I don't > know to write an axis client for this. > > Hope this helps(Not a complete answer, but partial). > > Cheers, > Ranjith Pillai. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Woinoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 1:47 PM > To: Axis User mailing list > Subject: How to define document/literal service with multiple operations > > How can I define a document/literal service with multiple operations? > Because > there's no wrapper element around the input message parts, Axis seems to > have a > problem invoking the correct service method. > > If I add a value for SOAPAction in the service's binding, the client stubs > set > SOAPAction in the HTTP request correctly, but Axis doesn't use the > SOAPAction > value. I found the Axis HTTPActionHandler class and tried adding it to the > request flow in the service's deploy.wsdd but it didn't seem to make a > difference. Does Axis support this? If so, how do I configure it? > > Thanks, > Mike > -- Mike Woinoski Pine Needle Consulting mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
