I'm now getting pretty clear on this .One last question?.
1.    For all other castor classes which are not enumtype should i use
castorserializers ?.
thx
pradeep.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to
bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written
agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail
for such purpose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




                                                                                       
                                               
                      "Gurkan, Ozzie                                                   
                                               
                      (MAN-Corporate)"         To:      "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>                         
                      <Ozzie.Gurkan            cc:                                     
                                               
                      @cox.com>                Subject: RE: 1.2 alpha and castor 
serialization                                        
                                                                                       
                                               
                      12/11/2003 02:09                                                 
                                               
                      PM                                                               
                                               
                      Please respond                                                   
                                               
                      to axis-user                                                     
                                               
                                                                                       
                                               
                                                                                       
                                               




1. Castor generates special classes when you use the "xs:restriction" for
simpleType in the schema. These special classes have no public constructors
and can only be created via the use of "valueOf" method. Since Java doesn't
provide "Enum" data types like C, C++ does, everyone has their own
type-safe
Enum implementation, and Castor is one of them.

2. You only need to add custom typeMappings into wsdd for these Enum type
classes. The other generated classes are JavaBeans that have public no-arg
constructors and hence are mappable using beanMappings tags in the wsdd
file.

3. Yes.

4. Yes. The namespaces are read from the schema file and are not lost. The
only thing that happens is that you now have control over the java package
names.

5. Right, you don't need to give the client any custom
serializer/deserializers, since the WSDL file will automatically contain
the
correct schema for generation.

6. Once you have the wsdd setup correctly on the server-side, generate the
WSDL file by running the server and pointing to ?wsdl URI. Then feed this
file into the Wsdl2Java class provided by Axis. As a matter of fact, you
can
feed the URL to WSDL directly into the generator. Here is a batch file
snippet to run the Wsdl2Java generator:

<snip>
set
axis.jar=%JAVALIBS%\jakarta\axis\1_1RC1\lib\axis.jar;%JAVALIBS%
\jakarta\axis
\1_1RC1\lib\saaj.jar;%JAVALIBS%
\jakarta\axis\1_1RC1\lib\jaxrpc.jar;%JAVALIBS
%\jakarta\axis\1_1RC1\lib\commons-logging.jar;%JAVALIBS%
\jakarta\axis\1_1RC1
\lib\commons-discovery.jar
set
xerces.jar=%JAVALIBS%\jakarta\xerces\2.2.1\lib\xercesImpl.jar;%JAVALIBS%
\jak
arta\xerces\2.2.1\lib\xmlParserAPIs.jar
set cp=%classpath%;%axis.jar%;%xerces.jar%

java -cp %cp% org.apache.axis.wsdl.WSDL2Java
http://localhost:8080/server/axis/Services?wsdl
</snip>

There is also good documentation on the Axis website on how to use it, too.


-----Original Message-----
From: Pradeep Jonnalagadda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 1.2 alpha and castor serialization



Hi Ozzie,
                    Thanks for the help. I have few questions based on ur
email reply. 1.  What are castor enum type classes. 2.  Do i have to change
typmapping for every entry in deploy.wsdd file to refer to
CastorEnumTypeSerializorFactory/CastorEnumTypeSerializorFactory or only few
selected castor classes files.If so what kind of castor files?? 3. Can we
use Doc/literal with ur approach. 4.When you define namespaces  package
mappings in castorbuilder.properties file and generate source with source
generator do you see namespace references in Descriptor files??. For
example
the descriptor code might look like this
   public AliasDescriptor() {
        super();
        nsURI = "http://beans";;
        setExtendsWithoutFlatten(new beans.AliasTypeDescriptor());
        xmlName = "Alias";
    } //--

5. Can i infer that i do not need to make any changes on client side .Can u
send ur client code??. 6. How do you generate client code from thw wsdl?.
Ur
answers would help a, lot. thx pradeep.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------

This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to
bind
CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written
agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail
for such purpose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------






                      "Gurkan, Ozzie

                      (MAN-Corporate)"         To:
"'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

                      <Ozzie.Gurkan            cc:

                      @cox.com>                Subject: RE: 1.2 alpha and
castor serialization


                      12/11/2003 01:04

                      PM

                      Please respond

                      to axis-user









One other advantage to my approach is that the client side doesn't need the
Castor Serializer/Deserializers at all--not even the enum type. That is
because I allow the WSDL to be created by Axis Server automatically and
hence the WSDL2Java creates pure Bean Serializer/Deserialzer code. As a
matter of fact, I don't generate client code anymore. I just tell my
clients
to get the WSDL and generate it themselves. They have no clue that I am
using Castor beans in the background!

Ozzie

-----Original Message-----
From: Gurkan, Ozzie (MAN-Corporate) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:37 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: 1.2 alpha and castor serialization


Unlike the article, I don't include the XSD in the WSDL file. I let the
automatic WSDL generation process that Axis does generate it for me. I do
generate the castor classes (along with the *Descriptor classes) from the
XSD file and define these as beanMappings:

                         <!-- Custom serializer/deserializer for Castor
Enumtypes-->
                         <typeMapping
deserializer
="org.apache.axis.encoding.ser.castor.CastorEnumTypeDeserializer
Factory" qname="ns19:creditBrokerSelected"
serializer
="org.apache.axis.encoding.ser.castor.CastorEnumTypeSerializerFact
ory"
type="
java:com.manheim.service.creditreport.schema.types.CreditBrokerSelecte
dType" xmlns:ns19="http://creditreport.service.portal.manheim.com/2003/8"/>

                         <!-- Normal BeanMapping tag for a Castor bean
class-->
                         <beanMapping
languageSpecificType="
java:com.manheim.service.creditreport.schema.CreditChe
ckRequest" qname="ns176:creditCheckRequest"
xmlns:ns176="http://creditreport.service.portal.manheim.com/2003/8"/>
                         <beanMapping
languageSpecificType="
java:com.manheim.service.creditreport.schema.CreditChe
ckResponse" qname="ns176:creditCheckResponse"
xmlns:ns176="http://creditreport.service.portal.manheim.com/2003/8"/>

I am using RPC/encoded style and had it successfully working with literal,
too. The only difference is that when you are doing "literal", you have to
set the "encodingStyle" on the typeMapping element to a "".

So, the difference from the article is that I don't allow delegation of the
entire SOAP body to a CastorSerializer, which ends up using DOM--that is
incredibly bad! I can attach the code for the EnumType serializer, if you
do
need it.

A couple things to note on the code generation:
- I almost always use namespace mapping to generate proper class package
names. That is specified in castorbuilder.properties.
- I wrap my messages with request and response objects. See beanMapping
elements, CreditCheckRequest and CreditCheckResponse. These objects inherit
a ServiceRequest and ServiceResponse abstract class.

Advantages:
- No hand modification to WSDL. Use the ?wsdl to auto generate with no
customization.
- Uses standard BeanSerializer/Deserializer methods, which are optimized to
use SAX pipeline.
- Minimal customization for EnumTypes, which doesn't use DOM, and
automatically generates the proper schema for WSDL.
- Works with RPC encoded/literal, etc.


Ozzie Gurkan

-----Original Message-----
From: Pradeep Jonnalagadda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 1.2 alpha and castor serialization



Hi Ozzie,
       I'm interested in ur solution. Can u send me the required files and
give me a short note on how to use them in the context of the article . thx
pradeep.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------


------------

This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to
bind
CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written
agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail
for such purpose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


------------











Reply via email to