Hi Mike, I am not sure about the standards, but IONA's Artix provides transports for SOAP or HTTP, JMS, CORBA and others, may be checking out a few articles on their site would be beneficial.
Thanks. Kartik --- Mike DuVall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My understanding of the SOAP bindings situation is > as follows: > > The official SOAP specification provides a standard > binding for how to > communicate SOAP messages over Http. This is the > reason that different SOAP > over Http providers can expect to interoperate; > because there is a defined > standard on how to do things. > > Further, it is my understanding that there is no > official standard binding > for how to do SOAP over JMS. This means if that any > two parties develop > there own mechanism for doing SOAP over JMS, there > is no reason to expect > these two different implementations to interoperate. > In fact, one should > expect that they would NOT interoperate. > > More specifically, if a company was to independantly > come up with a > mechanism for doing SOAP over JMS, they should > expect that it would not > interoperate with the Axis implementation of doing > SOAP over JMS. > > Can someone knowledgable in this area please confirm > whether the above is > correct? And if it is not correct, where have I > gone amiss? > > Thanks, > Mike > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get fast, reliable access with MSN 9 Dial-up. Click > here for Special Offer! > http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200361ave/direct/01/ > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
