RE: Asking again: Document/literal client app (from WSDL2Java) doesn't work

[Paulo Soares]

Maybe I'm just lucky but I've generated the wsdl with the WRAPPED style and java, .net and gsoap all talk to each other, DIME attachments included.   Best Regards, Paulo Soares From: David Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 8:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Asking again: Document/literal client app (from WSDL2Java) doesn't work     From: David Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 1:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Document/literal client app (from WSDL2Java) doesn't work   And to follow up, I removed the “-y DOCUMENT -u LITERAL” from the Java2WSDL call and now it all works fine. (Except that I need document/literal for .net interoperability.)   Thanks – dave     From: David Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 1:24 PM To: Axis Users Subject: Document/literal client app (from WSDL2Java) doesn't work   Hi;   I created a server using: java org.apache.axis.wsdl.Java2WSDL -o adder.wsdl -y DOCUMENT -u LITERAL -T 1.2 -l"http://localhost:8080/axis/services/Adder" -n "http://www.thielen.com/" -p"Adder" "http://www.thielen.com/" Adder.Service1 java org.apache.axis.wsdl.WSDL2Java -o server -N"http://www.thielen.com/" "Adder" -s -T 1.2 adder.wsdl   And then created a client using: java org.apache.axis.wsdl.WSDL2Java -o jclient -N"http://www.thielen.com/" "Adder" -T 1.2 http://localhost:8080/axis/services/Adder?wsdl   The api is very simple: public int Add(int num1, int num2);       public String HelloWorld();   But the results are very weird. The soap body sent over for HelloWorld is fine and works: <soapenv:Body>   <HelloWorld xmlns="http://www.thielen.com/"/>  </soapenv:Body>   But for Add – it doesn’t have the method name: <soapenv:Body>   <in0 xmlns="http://www.thielen.com/">1</in0>   <in1 xmlns="http://www.thielen.com/">2</in1>  </soapenv:Body>   Any idea what’s going on and how to fix? (To totally test, in undeployed the server, rebooted, deployed, and ran it again. So I’m 99% sure it’s not pointing at the wrong code.)   Thanks - dave