Thanks Michael,
This is very useful.

You found that .NET 1.1 doc/literal doesn't work with Axis 1.2 Beta 3
for complex objects, object arrays etc.. 
How did they fail to interop in your tests? 
I found that .NET wrappers arrays of complex objects with a container
element, whereas Axis simply serializes the array elements directly
inside the operation node (child node of soap body element), could you
corroborate this?

Which is correct? (I don't see a directive in the spec anywhere)

Thanks,
Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Thiele, Michael (LDS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 3:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Eric Chijioke
Subject: AW: Axis and .NET interoperability - Arrays 

Eric,

we could not find sufficient information about interoperability in
detail and checked out those issues with Axis and .NET on our own. Here
is a list of out _primarily_ results. If we have some more time we will
publish testcases and bugreports... 

HTH.

Please use a monospaced font to view the matrix

Server:                           
Apache Axis 1.2 Beta 3  

Clients:
Microsoft .NET 1.1 RPC/encoded------------| Microsoft .NET 1.1
Doc/literal(wrapped)-| | Apache Axis 1.2 Beta 3 Doc/literal----| | |
Apache Axis 1.2 Beta 3 RPC/encoded--| | | | Apache Axis 1.1 final
RPC/encoded-| | | | |
                                  | | | | |
Datatypes:                        | | | | |
Simple Datatypes..................x.x.x.x.x
String Arrays.....................x.x.x.x.-
Complex Objects...................x.x.x.-.x
Object Arrays.....................x.x.x.-.x
Complex Object w/.................x.x.x.-.x  nested Object Arrays..
Complex Objects w/................x.x.x.-.x  nested Object w/  nested
Object Arrays


Server:  
Apache Axis 1.1 final

Clients:
Microsoft .NET 1.1 RPC/encoded------------| Microsoft .NET 1.1
Doc/literal(wrapped)-| | Apache Axis 1.2 Beta 3 Doc/literal----| | |
Apache Axis 1.2 Beta 3 RPC/encoded--| | | | Apache Axis 1.1 final
RPC/encoded-| | | | |
                                  | | | | |
Datatypes:                        | | | | |
Simple Datatypes..................x.x.o.o.x
String Arrays.....................x.x.o.o.x
Complex Objects...................x.x.o.o.x
Object Arrays.....................x.x.o.o.x
Complex Object w/.................x.x.o.o.x  nested Object Arrays..
Complex Objects w/................x.x.o.o.x  nested Object w/  nested
Object Arrays

-------------------
o: not tested
x: tested, works
-: tested, does not work

Note 1: Of course, we changed the style (RPC/encoded, Doc/literal) on
the server side first and generated new stubs for each client.
Note 2: You have to transfer data to test interoperability. Only
validataing if stubs can be generated is not sufficient.
Note 3: There is no difference in interoperability if you are using .NET
1.1 with or without .NET Service Pack 1 and with or without Microsoft WS
Enhancements.
Note 4: There were no differences regarding this issues using
Doc/literal or Doc/wrapped in Axis 1.2 Beta 3 Note 5: Simple Datatypes:
int, Integer, double, Double, String,
java.util.Calendar(!) etc.; Complex Objects: like Address or so.; Object
Arrays like Address[]; Complex Object w/ nested Object Arrays like
Person with nested Address[];


As a result we cannot recommend using Doc/literal at this time if one
client is using .NET. 

Best regards
 
Mummert Consulting AG
 
Michael Thiele
Senior Consultant
Integrated Business Consulting
 
Neue Weyerstr. 6
D-50676 Koeln
 
Tel: +49 221 92404-6130
Fax: +49 221 92404-6199
Mob: +49 178 6612185
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mummert-consulting.de
 
LDS-NRW
Mauerstr. 51, Raum 9.27
40476 Duesseldorf
Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Durchwahl: +49 211 9449-2455


-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: Eric Chijioke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. September 2004 18:03
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Axis and .NET interoperability - Arrays 



I have read a LOT of discussions concerning problems serializing and
deserializing arrays between an Axis server and a .NET client but can't
seem to find any definitive discussion/document. Is there one?

Secondly,

[...]


Thanks

Eric Chijioke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Reply via email to